Carnival of Wealth, Status Unquo Edition

 

This nice lady said this nice thing about us. She gets it. And by “it” we mean what we’re trying to do here at Control Your Cash. Which isn’t hard to grasp. Maybe to swallow, but not to grasp. As you’re reading this, 8000 other personal finance bloggers are writing about emergency funds, and balance transfers, and how to prepare budgets (that they’ll never stick to), and trying to manage their credit card debt, and how to save money by using coupons, and all sorts of other boring and repetitive nonsense that goes down easily like strained carrots. Control Your Cash is different, as are our wonderful submitters.

Which brings us to another edition of the Carnival of Wealth. A collection of personal finance blog posts from across the globe. Some are great, some are awful, few are mediocre. If you’re a blogger who fancies herself worthy of being featured (or doesn’t mind running the risk of being mocked), submit here. And now, we commence:

Anisha at Nerd Wallet hits on one of our favorite topics, prepaid debit cards. Not one of our favorite products, one of our favorite topics. There’s still something unseemly about being charged money for the privilege of spending your money, but if you’re dumb enough to get into that situation in the first place that’s your problem. Anisha points out that the ridiculous prepaid cards endorsed by people like that hoyden Suze Orman are giving way to slightly less bad cards. It’s great to see actual pragmatism in a blog post – rather than whine about how debit card issuers are taking advantage of the poor, Anisha understands that commercial transactions (such as a poor person buying a debit card) entered into freely have a purpose and benefit both sides, however unevenly.

Another well-written post? On the same topic? No way. Michelle White at CardHub reviews the latest prepaid card from…well, it’s a joint venture between American Express and Zynga – the creators of FarmVille. The FarmVille prepaid card. The infantilization of America continues unabated. We’re sure it’s an awful card just on appearances, but Michelle breaks down the card’s worthlessness in greater detail and with more patience than we’d be willing to put on the task.

Last week we got an email from a personal finance blogger who lamented that nearly 100 people submitted to a similar carnival he’d been taxed with hosting. We pointed out that all he has to do is alienate the lousy submitters, and he’ll get that number down to something more manageable in no time. It’s about quality, not quantity. Meaning that we can devote expanded attention to informative bloggers like Andrew at 101 Centavos. Andrew has that fear we all have – peniaphobia. (Oh, grow up.) Richer people than him have ended up sleeping in flophouses, so Andrew’s taking steps now to take care of the downside. Best of all, he wrote this entire post without talking about the inanity of emergency funds, a fallback topic for most personal finance bloggers.

The formidable Οδυσσέας Παπαδημητρίου of Wallet Blog (that’s Odysseas Papadimitriou to you, Ace) returns this week, asking if tax evasion in Austria and Luxembourg affects investors in the United States. We wouldn’t have guessed that Οδυσσέας is in the pro-collection camp, but that’s just part of what makes the CoW interesting.

(Post rejected because it’s a throwaway English as a Second Language submission from someone with a child’s understanding of credit card rewards. We’re not going to let it ruin an otherwise perfect CoW. And we just jinxed it.)

New submitter this week, Dave at Dividends For The Long Run. Yes, he wrote about Facebook but a) he was self-aware about his choice of topic, b) he’s an active-duty Army officer, and c) the man can write.

(Got dang. On first pass, we merely scanned his post. Now we’re reading it in detail. This is the rare “we wish we’d written this” post. Every word is gold. We can’t even restrict ourselves to a particular passage to showcase here. It’s tough, but let’s try:)

Large numbers of retail investors tried to make a quick killing on an extremely popular social-media company without doing anything approaching due diligence prior to hitting the “submit” button on their discount brokerage’s website.  Predictable events (the stock price did not double, triple, or any other sort of -iple on the first day) and unpredictable events (the NASDAQ system had a stroke) conspired to part the fools from their money in a matter of hours.  Instead of taking the lesson to heart (don’t buy IPOs) these poor souls have resorted to a more instinctively American response: “It’s not my fault”.

We get the feeling Dave will be a regular feature around these parts.

(Rejected. A “back-to-school” post from last August. Even worse, they’re Canadian. No. We can’t accommodate any garbage this week. Things are going too swimmingly.)

We wrote a piece for Investopedia this week on the basics of investing. (That’s not the link, the piece hasn’t posted yet. That’s the link to our most recent Investopedia piece, which the San Francisco Chronicle picked up.) When the piece does run, it’ll bear an eerie similarity to Free Money Finance‘s recommendations for the novice investor. He simplifies it to a huge degree, but what he says is valid and worth remembering when you try to complicate things.

(Post rejected. Did you seriously think we were going to run something titled “The 8 Worst Exercises For Your Joints” just because it’s posted on a site with the word “insurance” in its title? Anyhow, it’s easy enough to find if you want to read it. And if you’re fat and need 8 excuses not to exercise.)

(“10 Ways Canadians Can Save Money At The Movies”. Good Lord. How about “7 Ways To Reject Banal Posts”?)

Sometimes we wonder if Dividend Growth Investor would be interested in any stock that’s guaranteed to double in value but promises not to pay a dividend. Ask Steve Jobs or Warren Buffett how they feel about dividends (from the perspective of the company that issues the stock.) Alright, you can’t ask Jobs because he’s dead and you can’t ask Buffett because he’s traveling the world with the surviving member of that odd little threesome he was once a part of, but you get the point. Dividend Growth Investor argues that you can make $1000 a month in dividend income if you pay enough attention. He also gives helpful descriptions of Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, Philip Morris and McDonald’s, just in case you’re unfamiliar with those companies.

Finally, PKamp3 at DQYDJ.net discusses options. Even a bright guy like him admits that such first-order financial derivatives are too complex for his investing tastes. However, if you look at the prices of puts and calls, and their upcoming strike dates, you can plot where collective wisdom says the S&P 500 will end up. The accompanying graphs just add to the authoritative nature of this interesting take on the information that can be gleaned from options prices.

GOOD LORD. EVERY POST WAS A WINNER THIS WEEK. That has never happened before, and will never happen again. It’s as if an 8-planet conjunction bowled a 300 game, then spent a romantic night with Liz Claman.

Thanks for coming. Here’s our latest on Forbes. Forbes! Ghost Malcolm Forbes can barely pull away from Ghost Elizabeth Taylor long enough to look at the destruction left in our wake. We’re also on Yahoo! Finance, Investopedia, ProBlogger, etc., etc. New blog post here Wednesday, new Anti-Tip of the Day everyday, new CoW Monday. Sayonara.

You Idiots Deserve To Be Poor

"I want to be young, smart and successful! So I'll do it vicariously through these people."

From Bloomberg:

Ryan Cefalu, who lives with his wife and two kids in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, saw in Facebook’s much-anticipated initial public offering a chance to buffer his retirement fund. His expectations fizzled along with the stock within the first minutes of trading.
“It’s disheartening to know that things get over-hyped,” Cefalu, a 34-year-old data-systems manager who spent about $4,000 on the stock, said in an interview.

Let’s assume that quote isn’t taken out of context, although it’s hard to imagine what context it could be taken out of. The most overhyped IPO in history, and Mr. Cefalu is expressing surprise at what, exactly? He’s implying that he bought the stock before it was overhyped, or that said hype has something to do with his losses.

Here’s another fool who deserved to soon be parted from her money:

“I thought it would be fun to get in on the initial frenzy,” said Linda Lantz, an online marketer in Granite Bay, California, who bought 100 shares. “Now it makes me think ‘Oh God, should I bail or is it going to come back?’”

Fun? Where is the fun? Is it inherently “fun” to have a line in your E*Trade account that reads:

100 FB NASDAQ 5-17-2012 $39.84?

If you want fun, go target shooting or buy a kitten. (If you want lots of fun, combine the two.) More to the point, if you’re investing for fun, you’re in even worse shape than a guy who goes into debt to film a movie and then begs for people to cover the expenses.

You invest to make money. Sweet feathery Jesus, how much more obvious a point could this be? Look, we get that an iPad or a Birkin bag conveys something about your status and tells passersby that you want them to think you have disposable income. But Facebook stock? You do know that corporations no longer issue physical certificates, right? You can’t literally show your stock purchase off to people unless, again, you invite them to look at your computer screen while you’re logged into your brokerage account.

Michael McClafferty, a freshman finance major at Michigan State University, saw his “first big investment” turn into a $3,000 loss when he sold the shares at $35.
“I didn’t want to lose more,” McClafferty said. “I didn’t know what to do.”
The 19 year-old student estimates he spent $8,000 more than he wanted to while repeating orders that wouldn’t go through on the first day, and failing to cancel them because of the technical problems.

Anyone want to bet on whether Mr. McClafferty has incurred any student loans? We hope to God that he has rich parents financing the education that he’s getting but that isn’t taking. This would be slightly more forgivable if he were majoring in sociology.

Some out-and-out lying doesn’t hurt, either:

Pat Brogan, a Yahoo! Inc. manager who trades on sites run by E*Trade and Fidelity in her spare time, called the experience of buying Facebook stock the “biggest fiasco” in her 30 years of day trading.

Two points from Ms. Brogan’s debacle. Number 1, no one day-trades for 30 years, for the same reason that no one plays day-Russian Roulette, day-wrestles grizzly bears or day-shoots up heroin for 30 years.

Also, risking your own money in the hopes of returns isn’t something you do “in (your) spare time.” It requires a little more intellectual commitment and wariness than do quilting or playing Gran Turismo 5.

Alright, a 3rd point. What was she expecting? Of the thousands of equities she could have chosen to purchase last week, she picked the one with zero history as a public company. If you’d asked her “Why’d you buy Facebook today, instead of Hewlett-Packard or Time Warner?”, what do you think she would have answered? Or any other sheep who thinks investing is about status and internal feelings of hipness rather than making a mother-loving profit?

Because they thought they could beat the system. They’d be the ones to buy Facebook at (its opening price + x), then sell it hours later at (its opening price + x + y). Which is to say, they had to know they wouldn’t be the absolute first in line, right? And that the people who did get in earlier were entitled to their own profit, right? Still, Ms. Brogan and her compatriots had it all figured out. They’d get in early enough to allow those preceding investors their profit, then enjoy their own as they cashed out to the next round of lemming/piranha hybrids on the horizon.

Oh, who are we (and they) kidding? The day traders and speculators who tried to buy Facebook stock as early as possible would have held onto it had it risen. Fortunately for them, or at least for us, it didn’t.

But no, the alleged “30-year day trader”, the college kid, and the Louisianan looking to settle his retirement in one day know more than the insiders do.

The chance of you purchasing Facebook stock at the appropriate minute on the day of its IPO, then selling it within a day or two at a substantial profit, is nonexistent. First, you don’t know as much as the stock’s underwriters do, and second, if you’re greedy enough to try and time the market like that, you’re not going to be satisfied with a modest $4 or $5 gain. You’ll want that baby to rise to hundreds of dollars a share, just as AOL (now around $28) and Yahoo! ($15 or so) did. Otherwise you’re alleging that the avarice that got you there in the first place can be kept in check at certain points. Come on.

We do way too many sports analogies on this site, but that’s not going to stop us from doing another one. If you sink a half-court shot to win a Kia Sorrento at halftime of an NBA game, even if you hit nothing but net, the home team’s general manager is not going to offer you a contract. Not even at the league minimum. You got lucky. The ability to consistently hit half-court shots is as rare, and as practically useless, as the ability to time when to get into and when to get out of IPOs. We say “practically” useless because you can’t build an offense around 3-point attempts taken 47’ from the basket, any more than you can build an investing strategy around knowing when to board and disembark the IPO train.

Twitterer @DubaiAtNight, who was one of the most insightful commenters on Control Your Cash back when we allowed comments, put it best:

Imagine if had been Koch Industries that went public. (As if. The Koch brothers aren’t stupid.) The biggest private company in the world then opens itself up to general investors, and a combination of nefarious underwriting and technical glitches leads to a bunch of unprepared dilettantes losing their money. The U.S. Senate, the President and the SEC wouldn’t be able to land on Koch management fast enough. The 1%, keeping the 99% down, etc., etc. Meanwhile, if a tousle-headed 20-something with an affinity for hoodies is at the helm, and if the product in question is something commonplace, benign, and beyond most people’s technical understanding, no big deal.

Investing isn’t a freaking game. It can be fun and rewarding, but a) not over the course of an afternoon and b) it takes work. Here, read this and step back from the maelstrom. You can thank us when you’re rich.