Nothing Is Your Fault Or, Student Loans Are Killing Our Economy, Part CXXV

 

This picture was taken in 1992, right when the loan balances were at their highest. No word on how much the wedding cost, or if the betrothed paid for it out-of-pocket.

 

We’ve got a fantastic investment idea for you, one that you’re a fool if you don’t take advantage of. It’s a no-brainer, really. Refusing this investment would be like turning down matching funds from your employer for your 401(k). In fact, it’s even more fundamental than that. Refusing this investment would be like turning down a raise. “Do you want more money?” “No, I’m good with less, thanks.” Saying no to this investment would be like simultaneously spitting on the flag and tearing up a Bible. (Note: On the first draft that showed up on the page as “tearing up a Buble”, which would be awesome. Thank you, Mr. Qwerty, for putting the “I” and the “U” keys next to each other and making such comedy possible.)

And if you need more incentive, the President himself does it.

The investment? Student loans! Yes, they come with a mandatory interest payment, but who cares? Investment! In your future! (As if you could have an investment in your past or your present.) Keep repeating buzzwords as necessary!

If you needed any further proof that our economy is doomed and that you should save yourself and your loved ones first, read this quote from the chief executive himself:

We only finished paying off our student loans off about 8 years ago. That wasn’t that long ago. And that wasn’t easy–especially because when we had Malia and Sasha, we’re supposed to be saving up for their college educations, and we’re still paying off our college educations.

To recap: the President of the United States has a B.A. (from Columbia, which is not inexpensive) and a law degree (Harvard, which is less so). He started attending Occidental College in 1979 before transferring, and received the law degree in 1991. He financed at least one of the degrees, and paid back the loans in 2004.

So it took him somewhere between 13 and 25 years to pay off his education. Let’s split the difference and call it 19.

Also, while paying off the loans, he and his wife decided it’d be a good idea to take on more expenses – in the form of a couple of children. Those children, by the way, now attend an elementary/middle school that costs them a combined $64,920 to attend every year (includes hot lunch).

Let’s take the last part of that quote again:

We’re supposed to be saving up for their college educations, and we’re still paying off our college educations.

“We’re supposed to be saving up for their college educations”, as if it’s a moral imperative on a par with “we’re supposed to feed and clothe them.” No one even questions the value of this anymore: going to college is at least as important as anything else you can think of.

The above quotes come from a speech to, appropriately enough, a bunch of college kids (at the University of North Carolina); none of whom spent the previous weekend passing around the bong and sleeping through lectures. President Obama didn’t get into the financial details of his and the First Lady’s loans, but we do know that they took somewhere around 2 decades to pay off.

But that’s OK, because a college degree enables you to earn more money, right? It should be obvious that whatever increase in salary these borrowers enjoyed because of their educational status, it was more than negated by the price of the loan. 19 years is practically half a regular working life, and it’s being spent committed to paying down the debt incurred to ostensibly enrich that life in the first place. How much further could we take this? Would it be OK to work for 42 years, and spend 41 years paying off student loans? Why not? Investment (in your future)!

Some of you wags are bringing up objections. We can hear them already. Let the debunking begin:

1) “He was a law professor. An intellectual. The smartest man alive, in fact. What was he supposed to do, drive a truck?”

So by virtue of being smarter than someone who began working sooner and accumulated no debt in the process, the smart person…incurs obligations that take 2 decades to pay off? Fine, you lead 1-0.

2) “Well, he ended up as President. Therefore incurring student loan debt was the right move.”

By that logic, you can defend everything he did before the 2008 election. Snorting coke while organizing the community? +1. Attending a church presided over by a lunatic preacher with insane opinions? Another +1. Kids, put down the shovel and instead pick up the mirror and the straw. Then join the Westboro Baptist Church. Ticket to success, right there.

Finally, for fairness and balance, let’s include another quote about tertiary education from another man running for president:

When I went to school, we didn’t have a federal student loan program, and I was able to work my way through college and medical school because it wasn’t so expensive.

Never mind. Those are clearly the ramblings of a crazy person.

Seriously, why was college so much cheaper when Ron Paul was studying?

1. College hadn’t been rammed down our throats as mandatory. It was perfectly acceptable to brag that you were going to learn a trade after high school.

2. The government wasn’t involved.

The costs are allowed to skyrocket because you can keep kicking the can down the road. When no one has to pay the bill for decades, why even think about it? The same applies to healthcare: not post-2014 healthcare, but healthcare as it’s currently constituted.  When a 3rd party – the government, an HMO – gets between the provider and the payor, who knows (and who cares) what things cost? It’s not your problem. “My insurance is handling it.” Sure, insurance is supposed to reduce individual risk, but it increases collective risk. Give 100,000 people the same policy, same coverage, same premium and same benefits, and many of them will take risks they wouldn’t have otherwise. At that point, why not smoke and/or ride a motorcycle unhelmeted? Again, it’s not your problem. It’s someone else’s.
Furthermore, if you declare bankruptcy, the courts won’t discharge your student loans. From the lender’s perspective, this is great. If you can fog a mirror and have a Social Security Number, they’ll lend you the money.
But if the government got out of the picture, and the lenders risked losing money, they might start asking tough questions: like, “How will you pay this back with a B.A. in women’s studies?”
Would the government get out of the picture? A lot depends on who’s in charge, and what his own experience is.
This article is featured in:

Carnival of Wealth, Adopt-A-Pet Edition

 

Even the pig is still 8000 times better than a child

 

Welcome to another stirring edition of the Carnival of Wealth, the only blog carnival you need to read this week. Every Monday, we feature personal finance blog posts that are either a) interesting and/or intelligently written, b) awful enough for us to make fun of, or c) necessary to get us to a certain length. For many of our readers, the weekly highlight is determining which post goes in which category. Seriously, that’s the highlight of their week. These people need to find companionship.

Which brings us to our theme. One of the very few charities we support here at Control Your Cash is Best Friends Animal Society. (Why? Because humans can take care of themselves, a point we reinforce every day on this site.) If you’re unfamiliar, BFAS is a no-kill* rescue group. It’s probably most famous for taking in the dogs abused and mutilated by that felonious piece-of-filth cretinous Philadelphia Eagles quarterback, the one who inspires us to get down on our knees every Sunday and pray that he falls victim to a blindside hit resulting in a crushed spinal cord and has to drink out of a straw with his head forever immobilized.

In addition to the adoption events BFAS holds throughout the country, it houses 1700 dogs, cats, horses and other animals on its gigantic spread in idyllic southern Utah. Many of the residents of the sanctuary are available to adopt. They’re just sitting there, waiting for you to pick them up. If you happen to be visiting Kanab, Utah, the folks who run the sanctuary will even let you take a dog or cat for the day, acclimating him or her to outside human contact. (Kanab is extremely pet-friendly). There’s no obligation to keep the animal permanently, either. Unless you want to. Best Friends does fantastic work and deserves your money and/or time: but if you really want to help out, instead of giving them something, take something away. Help them reach their stated goal of “No More Homeless Pets” by adopting one of the adorable life companions on this page.

(Note: Here’s another charity we support, the Boo Boo Zoo. Officially the East Maui Animal Refuge, it’s a sanctuary for injured, sick and disfigured animals. From the blind cow to the leukemia-stricken kittens to the dogs left to die in the street, the refuge is populated by some of the saddest but most grateful creatures you’d ever want to meet. We’ve visited and can vouch for the care that the owners/operators and volunteers give. The refuge operates on an extremely tight budget, which would be bad enough even if the owners weren’t simultaneously dealing with government agents trying to choke the animals and their caretakers in red tape. Give them money.)

One more commercial, and all this one asks of you is a couple of mouse clicks. Before we begin today’s show, your humble blogger entered an essay contest at The Daily Muse, knowing it was a site for career advice and stuff but not realizing how strongly the site skews toward ladies. They chose 6 finalists, and all the other ones are female. The entrants were supposed to write on the topic, “The Biggest Mistake I Made at My First Job—and What I Learned From It.” Each entry is only about 600 words long, but if you don’t want to read through them all just vote for #4, the only one that involves chainsaws. (And if you want to know the difference between men and women, note the first word of the title of each essay.) Okay, now let’s get started:

Our first submission is from the chairman emeritus of the Carnival of Wealth, the intrepid Shailesh Kumar of Value Stock Guide. How comprehensive is the founder of the CoW? He’s included 47 top dividend stocks (italics ours) for April. He even enclosed his data in a downloadable Excel spreadsheet. Sorry, lady who submitted a post on how to organize grocery coupons: we’re going with Shailesh’s post instead.

Did we say “dividends”? Indeed we did. Dividend Growth Investor is up next, with a discussion on 5 particular master limited partnerships. What’s a master limited partnership? We explained them a couple of months ago. He focuses on pipeline MLPs, which he likes because they’re natural monopolies. True. You have to be some kind of committed to run a pipeline next to someone else’s existing one.

Roger the Amateur Financier reviews a new book, Charles Richards’s The Psychology of Wealth. As best we can tell, the book isn’t so much about contrasting where rich people put their money vis-à-vis poor people, but rather the difference in mindset between the 2 groups. It’s worth repeating: what distinguishes rich people isn’t so much their ability to make smart decisions, but their insistence on avoiding stupid decisions. Poor people are poor largely because they decide to be.

As any Canadian emigrant to the United States knows, the Dominion is consistently a few years behind its southern neighbor. Everything from an all-sports TV network to diet cola debuted in America and then ultimately made it to Canada, usually within a decade or so. The latest example is Mint.com, the personal finance management site. It finally debuted in Canada last week, and JB at My University Money reviews it.

In case you think we’re needlessly bashing Canada, Boomer & Echo inadvertently brought up the same point in their submission this week. Free music services like Spotify aren’t available in Canada, either. Give it until 2017 or so. Why are we mentioning this? Because B&E list 10 fees that are worth paying. We agree with almost all of them, assuming that they were joking when they said it’s cool to pay a $99 annual fee for a credit card that can offer you 7 times that in rewards. (Keep looking. You’ll find similar rewards from a no-fee card, somewhere. Or you can just drop $69 a year for a Southwest Airlines credit card, at Stephen Vanderpool at Nerd Wallet recommends.)

Time for a post from a First World country. Mike Piper at The Oblivious Investor makes his majestic return to the CoW this week. He asks a question that could have spawned a dull answer in the hands of a less capable blogger, specifically “How Much Do I Need To Save Per Year?” Mike doesn’t give a definitive answer, because there isn’t one, but he does force you to think in different ways about a crucial question.

Net worth, cash flow and bullet points from Free Money Finance this week. The topics might be rudimentary, but they’re still important and someone, somewhere, was unfamiliar with them until clicking on that link.

John Kiernan at Wallet Blog has 6 fun facts about credit cards. We love fun facts. Did you know Goldfield, Nevada holds the distinction of being farther away from an interstate highway than any town in the lower 48 states? It’s up to you to determine if John’s facts are more or less fun than that. Probably less, because that one was plenty fun.

PKamp3 at DQYDJ.net (Don’t Quit Your Day Job) is clearly engaging us in a game of research one-upmanship. He wrote about (iconoclastically, for him) buying Mega Millions tickets. We wrote a little about the expected value of a ticket versus its likely value, now he’s taken it further with calculators and graphs. Two big takeaways (and you have to love a guy who opens a post with “If you don’t care, scroll down to the conclusion!”):

-At a certain prize level, the expected value of a ticket starts to decrease. We’d say “go figure”, but PKamp3 already did.
-2 comments so far. One is from someone who wanted a point of fact elaborated upon, which PKamp3 obliged. The other is from someone who says buying lottery tickets is cool because “it’s fun to pretend for a couple days that something wonderful might happen, and it only costs a couple bucks”, punctuated with 2 smiley-face emoticons. We’ll let you guess which is of which sex.

The lovely Liana at CardHub returns with a depressing post about greater credit card fees coming our way. And this has nothing, nothing at all to do with the Credit CARD Act passed by an activist Congress and signed into law by an activist president thanks to millions of whiny idiots who ended up on the hook for billions in credit card debt because they don’t know how to read a cardholder agreement.

We’re starting to get nostalgic for the rotten posts. There was a husky psychic who used to send us weekly posts about speaking to your dead ancestors. Which we’d run for the sheer ludicrousness (ludicrosity?) of it. Then people like Mich at Beating the Index had to spoil the party with their “expertise” and their “graphics” and their “staying on topic”. Like his most recent post, in which he analyzes the stock of a junior Canadian oil and gas company with interests throughout Alberta and Saskatchewan. It’s a company he believes in enough to have a position in, and a post both comprehensive and informative.

Why do exchange-traded funds beat mutual funds? Taxes, largely. There’s all the difference in the world between redeeming your capital for cash, as a mutual fund does, and redeeming for shares as an ETF does. Dan at ETF Base notes which is better, and don’t let the title of his site dissuade you from thinking he’s being objective.

From our “Reproduce a Page of a Textbook Most Convincingly” segment comes Paul Vachon at The Frugal Toad, who lists the advantages and disadvantages to taking retirement at different ages.

 

Just like that, it was over. Follow us on Twitter at @CYCash. Come back here every Wednesday and Friday for another, non-carnival-related post. And of course, the patented Anti-Tip of the Day is sitting in the right column, waiting for you to read and apply it. Plus we’re on Investopedia, constantly. (Toronto’s Globe & Mail found that one worth running.) And our 6-part series on ProBlogger is up to Part IV this week.

Is that enough? We thought so.

*If an animal sanctuary or shelter doesn’t specify that it’s no-kill, don’t kid yourself. It isn’t.