DOW HITS 7634! What now?

The father of irrational exuberance. If Bush had just yanked his hands down, a lot of problems could have been avoided

 

Huge, breaking, earth-shattering, paradigm-shifting, cliché-inspiring news this week, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average finally pawed its way back over the critical 7634 mark. No longer will we have to suffer in a world where the sum of the prices of 30 blue-chip stocks multiplied by a constant will begin with 7-6-2 or some lesser string of digits. Instead, let’s all stop at this milestone and take a needed respite.

Oh, sorry. Yeah, we were using base-12. Would you prefer we used base-10? Fine, but we’re going to use a different currency, euros. Which would make the Dow level 9807. No wait – let’s use base-12 and euros. That’d make the Dow level 5813. Isn’t this fun?

Most of the stock market “news” results from humans having 5 fingers on each hand and needing a way to count things. There isn’t any appreciable difference between a Dow at 12,999 and a Dow at 13,000, except that the latter burns a different array of bulbs in a digital readout and gives mathematically challenged journalists a chance to write headline fodder. Stop believing that this is in any way important.

From our favorite purveyors of loaded rhetoric, the Associated Press:

The Dow passed 13,000 about two hours into the trading day.

And from another AP story:

The average was above 13,000 for about 30 seconds before dropping back. It reclaimed the mark just after noon.

In the words of Anti-Nowhere League, “So (expletive) what?” They’re talking about this like it’s the moon landing, calibrating the event by time and duration so future generations will have a historical record of it.

Furthermore, the mere addition of one point to the Dow then becomes the catalyst for everything that follows. One more AP story, and a stunning example of why reading the news with a trusting eye is worse than not reading it at all:

The 13,000 level is a psychological milepost, but in a market built on perception, it could influence more cautious investors to pump more money back into the stock market, analysts said.

“You need notches along the way to measure things, and that’s as good as any,” said John Manley, chief equity strategist for Wells Fargo’s funds group…

Dan McMahon, director of equity trading at Raymond James, called the 13,000 marker a “positive catalyst, and that’s what we need to get us through the next range.”

Sounds like these Wall Street guys are as susceptible to “decimal bias” as the rest of us, right? No. McMahon continues:

In the end, he said, it’s just “a big round number.”

Which shows that the claims that “analysts said…it could influence more cautious investors to pump more money back into the stock market” is an unmitigated lie. Or if not a lie, then at least an unprovable assumption. Sure, Dow 13000 “might” influence investors to buy stocks. It also “might” turn the milk in your fridge sour. You don’t think so? Then show why it can’t.

CBS News has a video clip with the wonderfully objective title: “Dow 13,000: Time to Invest?”, which itself summarizes why financial illiteracy is pandemic. Yes, first let’s overpublicize a rise, however modest, in the Dow level. Then, let’s imply that people should buy stocks. Because that’s when you want to buy, when prices are rising.

You want superlatives? The Dow is now at its highest level since May 2008. When the Dow was at 12,990, that was its highest level since…May of 2008. Add the inexorable effects of inflation, however modest, not to mention whatever fees you paid for your index fund, and if you’d bought before May of 2008 you’d still be behind. If, however, you were dollar-cost averaging and buying units regularly since then, including when the market hit a local nadir of 6627 in March 2009, you’d be ahead. The Dow’s most recent movements, i.e. what it’s done in the past week, mean nothing.

We’ve talked early and often about the need to handle your financial transactions in a cold, calculating manner. Save the emotion and the irrationality for your personal, non-monetary life. When everyone else is chasing something, step back and ask why. When everyone else is fleeing something, same thing. And when a numerical quirk becomes front-page news, bumping Iranian oil embargoes to the second line, think about what that really means. To the extent that it means anything.

Yet another reason why our use of exclamation points on this site is so judicious. If a bunch of talking empty heads filling time in a TV studio have somehow convinced you that a .06% rise in the Dow is a reason to get your money out of your beer fund and put it towards stocks, we can’t help you. Besides, you don’t want to be helped.

There’s a time to get going, and a time to sit back (apologies to St. Francis.) If you don’t have an investment plan yet, run to the nearest brokerage house, bank, or human resources office and get one. It’s never too early to start.

But once you’ve invested, which we’re presuming you have, don’t drown in the details. Try to look at your portfolio quarterly. That recommendation is like Tolstoy’s challenge to not think of a white bear, but if you can do it, you’ll not only have greater peace of mind, you’ll be able to notice measurable differences in your portfolio more easily. It’s the same reason why parents marvel at how quickly their nieces and nephews grow, rather than how quickly their own kids do.

Getting excited, depressed, or even having an opinion about Dow 13,000 is mayfly syndrome. But you’re a human, with a lifespan tens of thousands of times longer than your typical mayfly. Even a giant daily swing in the Dow is utterly irrelevant, let alone one of just a few points.

This article is pick of the week in:

**Top Personal Finance Posts of the Week-Cutest Kids Ever Edition**

Trent Hamm’s Funniest Post

That’s the scalp of a man who mixes 2 parts vinegar to 5 parts bar soap residue to create his own shampoo.

 

We’re running out of adjectives to describe this halfwit. Or synonyms for halfwit, at any rate.

Maybe Trent Hamm of The Simple Dollar fancies himself as the self-help guru for our generation and generations to come. Or, judging by his cornpone naivete, for previous generations. But even Napoleon Hill never wrote like this a century ago. He would have found Trent Hamm’s style of writing a little too expository and vacuous. Yet Trent Hamm remains convinced that he’s giving his readers something worthwhile when he pulls a passage such as this out of his, well, passage:

Take a thorough shower and clean yourself as much as you can. Use underarm deodorant as well. Cleaning yourself properly is the most valuable aspect of your personal appearance.

For a mother with an especially stilted manner, this is wonderful advice to give to her 8-year-old son, if they happen to live in Victorian England.

But Trent Hamm is a 30-something American who claims to function in the modern world. People actually read this dunderhead. By the way, his stratagem about taking showers (and using underarm deodorant) comes from the same invaluable post in which he tells us to brush our teeth.

We don’t want to ruin the ending for you, but there’s something in there about flossing and using mouthwash, too. With a clean body and a clean mouth (courtesy of Trent’s handy homemade toothpaste, no less), you’re ready to start the day. No, wait. One more thing:

Use a fragrance that smells good to you every day. For my own use, I have a small collection that I freely alternate between on a daily basis; I like every one of them that I use in this rotation. Among these are Eternity, Emporio Armani, Dreamer, Dolce and Gabbana, Acqua di Gio, and Platinum Egoiste.

Where do we start? It’s going to require a few lines of pensive thought, represented by white space, to attack this in the proper fashion. You don’t eat an elephant in one bite.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Should we begin with the laughable grammar? No, that’s too easy. Let’s move on, but not before pointing out that you can’t “alternate”, freely or under orders, “between” only one collection.

Okay then, what about his penchant for filler? “I like every one of them that I use in this rotation.” Really? That’s odd. Most people hate the smells they choose to smother themselves in. No, still too easy. Come on, dig deeper.

Jesus H. This is a man who can write 2000 words on how if you’d started buying off-brand chicken bouillon cubes instead of those fancy Oxo ones the day the first trilobite walked out of the ocean during the Cambrian period, you’d have saved 4¢ by now. Yet he owns 5.9 more bottles of cologne than does the average man of non-Mediterranean descent. (Hamm, for what it’s worth, is as WASPy as a mud dauber.)

Seriously, who the hell wears cologne? Prices, on Google Shopping:

Eternity$12
Emporio Armani50
Dreamer33
Dolce & Gabbana45
Acqua di Gio62
Platinum Egoiste79

We know a quick and easy way for the comically cheap Trent to save $281 on his cologne bill.

Let’s not forget that most of Hamm’s readership is female and has limited use for this advice. Unless he’s openly soliciting Christmas gifts from his readers, which we wouldn’t put past him.

However, if you are a woman and you ever have the following conversation with a man:

You: (sniffs) What is that?
Him: Oh, I’m wearing Dolce & Gabbana,

do humanity a favor and repeatedly kick that man in the vulva so hard that he loses all his senses except smell.

STOP RIGHT THERE.

Guys, you probably think that you take the bottle of fragrance (or as normal humans call it, cologne) and pour it on your chest and stomach. Why? Because you’re a The Simple Dollar reader and thus must have suffered cranial trauma at some point. But don’t worry, Uncle Trent has a safe (and frugal!) method for applying cologne. You too can smell like the men’s room at ghostbar. Here’s how:

Don’t apply them by spraying, just spray a bit on your hand and rub behind your ears and the sides of your neck with your moistened hand; this creates just the right level of fragrance for both men and women…

a) “Don’t apply them by spraying, just spray”

b) Who doesn’t have at least a semblance of an idea on how to apply cologne? Your humble blogger did it once, at his First Communion, and never forgot.

c) If you made it to adulthood (or at the very least, an age when reading The Simple Dollar interests you) without knowing how to apply cologne, there’s no hope for you if you’re taking advice from a disembodied fat man’s voice on this piece of sheep feces that masquerades as a functional blog.

Trent continues:

…and it also prevents you from wasting it, meaning you’ll have many more applications per bottle.

There is nothing that Trent Hamm can’t turn into a ode to frugality. We wish we’d been there the day Trent and the long-suffering Madame Hamm tried to conceive their first child:

Her: What are you doing? I’m ovulating! Get it in there!
Him: Honey, we don’t want to waste it. We could save it for future applica–
Her: It regenerates inside you! And guess what? IT’S FREE!
Him: (ejaculates)

Buy only clothes that go well with the majority of other clothes in your wardrobe. I own only ten dress shirts and eight business casual pants and I work in an environment where business casual is a strongly expected mode of dress, yet I manage to regularly elicit comments on how well dressed I am.

And that is the biggest lie that has ever been told.

Scroll back to the top of the page and get a good look at him. Breathe it all in, that shimmering example of masculine couture. No one, except possibly the clerk at the Goodwill store where Trent puts these ensembles together, has ever commented on how well dressed he is.

Furthermore, no one is this egotistical. Not even Deion Sanders would brag that people tell him what a sharp figure he cuts. Unless Trent is trying to be funny, but how is this humor? Where’s the payoff? Or is it all setup? For a clue, here’s a quote from February 10 of last year:

When I finally realized that the things I actually needed were incredibly minimal, I began to see how amazingly abundant my life was.

…I had reasonably good health. I had wonderful children. I had a good sense of humor.

In his defense, he did use the past tense. So maybe there was a time when he indeed had a good sense of humor. Notwithstanding that “I have a good sense of humor” is one of the two self-contradictory sentences in semantic logic, the other being “This sentence is false.” Explicitly stating that you have a good sense of humor negates the possibility of you having one.

Whenever Trent’s sense of humor might have existed, it had to have been before he started The Simple Dollar. Because nowhere on that site is there anything approaching wit, wordplay, or even lightheartedness. We’ll send an autographed copy of Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense to the first person who can find a funny line anywhere in The Simple Dollar archives*.

 

*Line must be intentionally funny. There goes your free book.