Carnival of Wealth, miserable cold edition

The Midway in the Pacific isn’t as dismal as this one

 

So, what shivering part of the Northern Hemisphere are you reading this from? Have you resorted to making a fire out of seldom-used furniture yet? It’s sunny and 80º here at our undisclosed location, a perfect situation for a) rubbing it in your faces and b) presenting the latest installment of the Carnival of Wealth. Again, these are personal finance posts from the genre’s most prominent bloggers, arranged in handy mini-paragraph form. Get readin’.

Remember the good old days, when every time you bought something with a credit card, you gave a minimum-wage clerk your credit card number and a copy of your signature? Boomer and Echo do, and argue that security has since gotten worse. They regale us with the tales of prospective tenant Amy Adams and theft victim Bill Brown, the least plausible pseudonyms we’ve ever heard. Tune in next week to see how Carmine Cappuccio, Don DeLillo and Edna Everage combat identity theft.

Marjorie Rochon at CardHub tells us that there are a few things you can count on every non-denominational holiday season that alienates neither Jews nor Muslims Christmas: time off from school; an overweight, bearded out-of-towner breaking into numerous houses in the neighborhood via chimney; eating too much; and gift cards. Learn how to handle that last one.

Some people pride themselves on not shopping at Walmart, as if low prices are somehow gauche. Odysseas Papadimitriou of Wallet Blog is not one of them. He bought a loved one an electronic Walmart gift card for Black Friday, because nothing shows you care like cash equivalents do. You’d think delivery of an electronic card would be simple, but for Odysseas it was anything but. For a company whose logistical prowess is world-renowned, Walmart dropped the ball this time.

We hadn’t heard from Jim Wang at Bargaineering for a while, but he’s back with a post on credit scores and how they impact the interest rates you might pay. Until Fair, Isaac & Co. make the credit score formula available to the public, we’ll have to keep guessing as to what makes a good score.

The recondite Paula Pant at Afford-Anything brings it again. Go to her blog, now, and subscribe to her feed.

Here’s why she’s good. She wrote about wealth vs. happiness this week, and unlike the 805,394,217 other people who have written on this topic, she doesn’t offer up some pablum about how money can’t buy you happiness, be thankful for what you have, no dollar amount can compare to the smile on a little child’s face, etc., etc. Instead, happiness is correlated with…well, if we don’t tell you here it’ll force you to click on the link and read her post.

Aloysa at My Broken Coin claims that “the best things in life should not cost you a thing.” But they do. Or, as a former Control Your Cash Man of the Year put it:

 

Turning 180º, you can’t accuse Daniel of Sweating the Big Stuff of breaking out clichés. He argues that doing what you love for a living could be a bad thing.

At Control Your Cash, we’ve distilled the secret to wealth into two sentences: Buy Assets. Sell Liabilities. Do that often enough and you can’t help but build wealth. Free Money Finance did the same thing, with different (but equally valid) sentences. Check his version out here.

Tim Fraticelli at Christian PF thinks it’s possible to negotiate without losing your soul, or your shirt. We’d add “determine what the other party wants” to his list of 4 tips.

Suba at Wealth Informatics thinks Christmas gifts are a waste of time and money. She’s right, and we write basically the same post every year, but hers has way prettier graphs.

This week’s Trent Hamm Memorial* Obvious Sentence Award goes to Kevin McKee at Thousandaire:

My mother has four siblings (my aunts and uncles). 

Thanks, Ace. Anyhow, Kevin hits on one of our favorite topics this week: whether entrepreneurs have it better than corporate employees do.

Darwin’s Money comes with something so depressing, we almost didn’t want to run it. We wanted to fly to his house and give him a hug. He and a partner bought a rental unit, dotted all their j’s and crossed their x’s, then had their parade rained on by a zealous (and we’re thinking, extortionate) insurance company.

Time for our in-depth deconstruction of the week. Our victim is Hank at Money Q&A, who offers advice in “Four Places to Find Great Stocks To Invest In” that swings between curious and horrible.

I routinely can look on my desk and the desks of my coworkers to find the products of great, quality companies to invest in.

Hank also thinks you should look for investing ideas from your kids’ toys, your kitchen, and the mall, which is not only a careless way to write a post, but insane. This is Barbra Streisand’s investing strategy. (She once said, “We go to Starbucks every day, so I bought Starbucks stock.”) Hands up, every GM vehicle owner who bought GM stock in 2009. Here’s Hank’s best line:

Have you seen the explosion of True Religion jeans? If you had, then you would have been in on one of the great growth stocks of the past year or so.

Really?

Yes, TRLG’s stock has risen 50% in the last year, so you can add Hank to the list of retroactive stock market millionaires. But does he think we should buy the stock today? It trades at 19 times earnings. The company lost $44 million (on revenues of $364 million) last year. And in a recession, $300 douchebag jeans are among the first things people cut out of their budgets.

Corey at Money Reasons goes confessional this week, acknowledging that his wealth plan might not be unassailable. He’s got at least a couple of backup plans ready to go, and an irrational fear of being defrauded by someone like Bernie Madoff. (If someone like Bernie Madoff has even partial control over your money, you’re already rich.)

Alright, back to the horror. Miranda at Financial Highway has 4 ideas for earning extra income, all of which are impractical and none of which any sane person will ever try. Wait, didn’t we goof on this submission already? Yes, we did. She sent it in 2 months ago, and we tore it to shreds that time. If she wants to come back for more, who are we to deny her masochistic fantasies? Anyhow, her idiotic suggestions:

1. Offer to deliver pizza, sodas and cookies to college students between the hours of 10 pm and 3 am. Yes, because the kind of students who are awake to eat junk food in the middle of the night are rich enough that they’ll pay someone else to bring it to them.

2. Scrapbooking for other ladies. As Miranda puts it,

They can bring over their photos, and you can put them together, in an attractive and memorable presentation.

We average only half a vagina between us, but we thought the whole purpose of scrapbooking was to immerse yourself in an activity while your husband’s at work and your kids are compromising your sanity. Are we at the point where we’re now farming out hobbies? Why not hire someone to golf or fish for you while you’re at it?

3., and this is the most ridiculous one of all:

(Y)ou can purchase portable toilets that can be rented out. Instead of just renting them out, though, you can make them a little bit nicer. Clean them up. Add air fresheners, include nice soap and lotion, fluffy hand towels, and decorate the inside. These nicer portable toilets could be rented out for upscale outdoor events like weddings, company parties and special receptions.  

A free copy of Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense to the first person who can show us evidence of a portable toilet whose purveyor lined the inside with decorations and “fluffy hand towels.” (Miranda: “You see? That’s my point. No one else is doing it! The market is all yours!”)

Portable toilets run about $800 apiece. To do this you’d need to buy multiple ones, and you’d need somewhere to store them. And a way to transport them. And…oh, for God’s sake, we could write another 326-page book just on what’s wrong with this idea.

Let Miranda’s post serve as a warning: if you’re going to submit to the Carnival of Wealth, step your game up. Merely writing the first thing that pops into your head will either get you rejected (if you’re lucky), or will get you published as an example of everything we’re not looking for.

That might be the single worst piece of advice we’ve ever seen. To truly grasp the absurdity of her post, don’t just read our summary. You really need to behold it in its original splendor.

And once again, thanks for letting us put this together. Let’s do it again next week, y’all.

 

*No, he’s not dead. But he is overweight.

Focus On The Small Picture

Slow down, ladies. Marie's trying to keep up with you

 

In Monday’s Carnival of Wealth, we briefly goofed on Marie at Family Money Values. Her submission frustrated us to the point where we were considering making her our Retard of the Month for November, but a) the Occupy Wall Street crowd deserved it more and b) it doesn’t look good if we give it to a woman 4 months in a row.

To summarize, Marie visited a rich friend’s house, then found rationalizations for not wanting to live there herself.

I’d be expected to keep up with (the neighbors)
I wouldn’t feel comfortable doing my own grass cutting in my much loved beat up old sweatshirt.

Think about Marie’s mindset, rather than her obvious dislike of hyphens. A self-actualized person doesn’t give a damn what other people think about such trivial social bugaboos. If Marie could afford such a house, she couldn’t enjoy it because Muffie and Philippa would be talking behind her back over cucumber sandwiches at the country club:

Muffie: Did you see that new woman mowing her own lawn yesterday afternoon?
Philippa: I know! It gave me the vapors. I had to lie down on the fainting couch for an hour while the butler brought me some Orange Pekoe laced with absinthe. For a second I thought she was one of our lawn care workers, but she didn’t seem Mexican enough.

Marie, you’re not going to believe this, but no one in the neighborhood cares about how self-conscious you are. And if they do, what do you care?

The homeowner didn’t look happy – I wondered why.
What did she give up to have that nice house? Did she marry someone she didn’t love, work in a job she hated or do something against her beliefs to get there? Was she lonely?  

Or was her brother just diagnosed with leukemia? Did she have to euthanize a family pet the day before? Did she and her husband just fight over something meaningless, which happens to couples in all economic strata? Or did she simply have a pounding headache, exacerbated by trying to entertain critical guests who are making mental notes about what an unfulfilling house she lives in? But no, feel free to project whatever justification makes you feel better about the residence that you’ve chosen.

There weren’t many personal or family history items.
My own home is full of things my family has owned or that my spouse and I have collected through the years. The contents represent times gone by (ours and our ancestors) as well as times to come. The beautiful house I was in looked like it could have been a furniture store – displaying items for sale. 

Okay, Marie, now you’re officially scraping. Congratulations on having a family history that’s worth preserving. Not everyone does. Your host could have a million legitimate reasons for not following your recommended keepsake-displaying procedure. She could have come from a violent past: lots of people do. Perhaps her parents were unfeeling jerks. Or she grew up in foster homes. How would you feel if someone made snap judgments about you from your appearance and demeanor? (Speaking of which, why not put a picture of yourself on your website so we can draw conclusions about you from it?)

And of course, the one reason Marie had been saving for the climax:

Keeping a million dollar house requires a lot of money.

Sweet Jesus, that’s irrelevant. First off, it’s safe to assume that someone who can afford such a house can afford its upkeep, and understood what that upkeep would entail before buying. But it gets better, as she breaks down that objection into sub-objections:

Cost of hiring services to keep up appearances (it’s too gauche to do the work yourself!)

Again, this unhealthy obsession with what others think. Muffie and Philippa long ago moved on from your disdain for class niceties, and are now discussing which pool boys they want to cheat on their husbands with.

There’s a little thing called Ricardo’s Law of Comparative Advantage. We’ve discussed it here before. It means that if the oil tycoon who lives next door to the house you visited earns $500/hour, he shouldn’t spend time tending to his yard in the middle of a weekday when he can find professionals to do so for $18/hour.

Besides, Marie, you were in this neighborhood for the duration of one baby shower, most of which you probably spent indoors. There could well be plenty of homeowners who mow their own lawns and paint their own fences.

We can’t guess as to the strength of Marie’s self-image, but she’s giving us some pretty convincing clues in her other sub-objections:

Membership in the various clubs or associations that are either required or expected for you to fit in
Wardrobe costs (remember that beat up old sweatshirt? Can’t wear that outside).
Vehicle costs – how could you park your 1998 Toyota in that driveway?

That, right there, is as succinct an explanation of why poor and struggling people stay that way. Who gives a flying f what you drive? Especially when you remember that vehicles are liabilities, not assets.

A vehicle serves a purpose, and by its nature as a tool with lots of moving parts, gets gradually less useful as it’s used more. If you know that a car’s only going to last a few years before having to be replaced, you’d be insane to drop money into it that you could invest elsewhere. (You see, Marie? This is how rich people think.) Go ask financial bad example Floyd Mayweather Jr. how important it is to drive an expensive car.

Better yet, ask the richest man in Los Angeles how important it is. (He’ll be easy to spot, in either his Firebird, his Jeep Grand Cherokee, or his Taurus.)

And then, the perfect coda. Marie dispenses some advice gleaned from her years as an authority on expensive houses and whether it’s worth it to live in one or not:

Consider carefully before moving up.

Sister, no offense, but maybe only a person who lives in an expensive house should tell us whether to “consider” doing so or not.

Thank God for people like Marie. They make us remember why the top isn’t very crowded: because most people would rather kvetch than get there.

This article is featured in:

**Carnival of Personal Finance December 5, 2011 Edition**

**Carnival of Financial Camaraderie**