Make more, pay less

Look closely - especially if you're at work - and you can actually see her soul leaving her body.

Dissatisfied in your job? Here’s the time-tested solution: tough it out, be thankful you have one, and come in next weekend just to emphasize the latter point.

Or you can tell The Man which orifice he can shove his company picnic and break-room coffee into, and go out on your own. Incorporate.

There are several volumes’ worth of reasons to do this. We can’t go into all of them now, but one of the best-kept secrets of incorporating is the regressive Social Security tax.

You might not be familiar with the concept of a regressive tax, but it’s easy to grasp. There are 3 species of tax:

-A proportional tax is one levied at a fixed rate. Sales tax, for instance. If your jurisdiction charges 7% sales tax, then any item subject to the tax costs 7% more than the list price whether the item goes for $1 or $100,000.

-A progressive tax means the higher the base amount, the higher the rate. Income tax in the United States (and most everywhere else, as far as we know) is an example.

That leaves the rarest bird in the aviary, regressive taxes.

You mean there are taxes where the greater the amount subject to the tax, the less you pay? That’s absurd. And illegal, right?

It’s cute that you think that. Not only do regressive taxes exist, they’re authorized by the same federal government that you entrust to have your best interests at heart. To fund the 2 biggest and least tenable programs in its tentacles – Social Security and Medicare.

Out of all the confusing, capricious, seemingly arbitrary taxes we pay, Social Security and Medicare taxes might be the most senseless.

The federal tax collectors (sorry, we don’t know most of their names, but Doug Shulman is the Internal Revenue Commissioner) take about 15.3% of your salary in the form of Social Security and Medicare “contributions”. Collectively, these are dubbed FICA – after the Federal Insurance Contributions Act. Remember, Social Security was invented because federal officials of a bygone generation decided that Americans were too stupid to save for retirement. Therefore it would take a benevolent government populated by financial geniuses to make those critical investment decisions for our grandparents, our parents, you, me, and our descendants. Medicare is essentially the same thing, but earmarked for a different purpose.

If you never look at anything but the net pay amount on your paychecks, take some time to read the other numbers. Just once. That 15.3% breaks down like this:

-6.2% employee’s Social Security taxes
-1.45% employee’s Medicare taxes
-6.2% employer’s Social Security taxes
-1.45% employer’s Medicare taxes.

Hopefully this is obvious, but you’re wrong if you think your employer pays its share of these taxes as a necessary cost of keeping so wonderful a worker as you on the payroll. She doesn’t pay these taxes, she merely collects them. You pay them. Your employer factors these taxes into your salary when she hires you. If your employer wasn’t required to pour 7.65% of your income into the subterranean trench that is the federal government, she wouldn’t. Instead, she’d much rather attract you and other employees with wage levels that are 7.65% higher than what you think you’re currently making.

How is this regressive? Sounds proportional to me.

The Social Security portion of your FICA taxes is capped once your annual income exceeds $106,800. You pay the 2.9% in Medicare taxes no matter how much you make, but the Social Security portion can’t go above $13,243.20. (Half of that levied directly on you, the other half levied on you via your employer.)

So the higher your salary – past $106,800, anyway – the smaller the proportion of it you pay in Social Security taxes. On the one hand, this gives you incentive to work hard and earn money. On the other, it’s the kind of inequality that French revolutionaries chopped off people’s heads for.

If you’re an independent businessperson, and you structure as an S corporation or a limited liability company, you can run around the system instead of through it. Incorporate, and you can pay out part of your company’s profits to yourself as salary while paying out the remainder as dividends. The former is subject to FICA, the latter isn’t.

What’s the downside?

You’d be surrendering the “certainty” of a regular, constant paycheck. As if there exists an employer who could guarantee such a thing in perpetuity anyway.

Still, it sounds promising. So why doesn’t everyone do this?

The usual reasons: fear of the unknown, lack of faith in themselves, etc. The same negative thinking that’s been holding most human ingenuity back since we figured out fire and the wheel.

Note: Some people blather that sales taxes aren’t proportional because the less you earn, the higher a ratio of your income you pay in sales taxes.
First off, sales taxes aren’t levied on income, they’re levied on sales. See “income tax”, above. Second, there’s no way around this. Unless you think state legislatures and municipal governments should mandate that merchants ask people how much money they make before determining how much tax to collect.

**This article is featured in the Carnival of Wealth #43**

A cupcake IPO? Seriously now?

 

 

Perfect for those weekends in Vegas with nothing to do

Yeah, this cupcake’s not feeling well and won’t be able to make it in today

 

NOTE: this post originally ran, in a slightly less libelous version, on Adaptu.

Intermediate readers, skip the next paragraph.

IPO = initial public offering. Refers to a formerly privately owned company finally making its shares available to whomever wants to buy them. The company now trades on a stock exchange and its financial statements are now public record. The biggest American IPO in history (not counting companies that went into receivership, became wards of the taxpayers and reemerged) was that of VISA in 2008. The heretofore private company opened on the New York Stock Exchange at $64.35/share. It peaked at $96.59 last April, and sits around 75 now.

On second thought, skip this paragraph too.

Somewhat evidently, every company has to do its IPO at some point. An IPO is obviously a big deal: and for many companies’ principals, who own options to buy the stock at a certain discounted price and will profit the second the company goes public, an IPO is as good as it’s ever going to get.

A few weeks ago, boutique cupcake retailer Crumbs Bake Shop went public. “Boutique”, by the way, is a French word meaning “small, but with cachet among urbanites and various other pretentious fools.”

Crumbs has 24 retail stores in the New York tri-state area, 6 in Los Angeles, 3 in D.C. and its environs, and 1 in Chicago with 3 more New York-area stores in the works. In New York and Los Angeles, they deliver to your door. The company is a public relations phenomenon, renowned as the creator of the Baba Booey cupcake (peanut butter frosting, chocolate cream cheese frosting, peanut butter chips) and the Artie Lange cupcake (chocolate cream cheese frosting, Vicodin filling, served in an edible wrapper doused in lysergic acid diethylamide).

Still, a company that can get Howard Stern’s attention is not necessarily a company worth investing in. If you’re old enough to remember Outpost.com, you know what we mean. Unlike VISA, Crumbs isn’t an internationally recognized name with decades of results behind it. Nor is it Microsoft (IPO 1986), nor Google (2004), with a palpable potential for growth and a revolutionary and established product line. Use whatever corporate buzzword you want with cupcakes, but “game-changer” doesn’t really fit.

Okay, what about its company history?
It barely has one. Crumbs was founded in 2003 by a husband and wife team – she’s a lawyer, he’s…well, here’s the relevant sentence from his official bio:

Jason started Famous Fixins, a manufacturer of celebrity licensed products, with such products as Britney Spears bubble-gum and NSYNC lip balm as well as products with high profile names such as Derek Jeter, Mike Piazza and Sammy Sosa.

We could go for a cool, refreshing, sturdy, gluten-free, Mac-compatible fair trade Sammy Sosa product right now. How about you?

Does it have goodwill – the accounting term that refers to intangible value beyond its assets?
Nothing you can quantify. To we middle Americans, Crumbs doesn’t even register. We’d even heard repeatedly about their novelty cupcakes, but couldn’t tell you the company’s name. The one New York cupcakery we did know the name of is Magnolia Bakery, and only because of that one Saturday Night Live bit.

Does the company have a competitive advantage that no one can replicate?
That depends. Do you have a kitchen and a couple of mixing bowls?

Crumbs’ IPO hit the ground with a valuation that now leaves it around $58 million. Granted, ExxonMobil has more than that in its petty cash envelope, but $58 million is a decent amount for a company that until this point has had only 2 visible owners.

The markup on a cupcake is enormous. Crumbs retails its cupcakes for $4.50. That’s each, not for a 4-pack. With that much profit baked into every bite, the company has designs on opening 300 more stores.

Making cupcakes can be profitable, maybe even in the long term. But a $58 million business? Here are a couple of schools of investing thought, each encapsulated in a single sentence:

You have to look at a company’s income, shareholders’ equity, how much debt it’s carrying and how much cash flows through it before you invest in it.
Control Your Cash

 

We go to Starbucks every day, so I buy Starbucks stock.
Barbra Streisand

It’s safe to say that Crumbs is counting on people who subscribe to the latter belief to help it grow into maturity.

But even Starbucks sells more than mere coffee. At one point the company went so far as to publicly consider itself the primary place to exist when you’re neither at work nor at home. The Wi-Fi and the music attest to that, and it appears to be working. Besides, when Starbucks went public it was far more entrenched than Crumbs is today.

It’s not that you can’t sell a capricious, semi-serious item in a recession – Altria and Molson Coors are both doing fine, and it’s slightly less harmful for society that overextended people stuff their faces with Baba Booey cupcakes rather than cigarettes or alcohol. But it’s hard. Let the lawyer and the manufacturer of celebrity licensed products build the business themselves.

We give the Crumbs founders our wishes for success. What we’re not giving them is our money.

McKesson has a $21 billion market cap and is trading at close to a 12-year peak. They sell payroll software to doctors, and prepare health claim management forms. You’ve never heard of them, which means they’re really underground. If that’s not hip and trendy, we don’t know what is.

**This article is featured in the Carnival of Personal Finance #314**