GUEST POST: Money on the (Examination) Table

It’s Wednesday, which means it must be time for another guest post from the mysterious MD. (Check out his post from last week if you haven’t witnessed his genius yet.) Now read:

Grant_DeVolson_Wood_-_American_Gothic

 

Dear CYC principals,

To the bewilderment of most Canadians I chat with on a daily basis, I like the U.S. enough to move to and call it home. Don’t get me wrong. The standard of living in Canada is great, it’s uniformly safe, and physician salaries are generally higher. For entirely non-financial reasons that differ from yours, I want to make the switch. The long winters just get to me, people are passionately indifferent about everything, and there’s a general lack of the sort of entrepreneurial spirit I sensed when I lived in the United States. Plus, I’m still bitter that Quebecers didn’t separate. At 5:00 most mornings, all I want to do is chew quietly and stare at an English-only cereal box. Is that too much to ask? 

I will be building U.S. credit from scratch beginning July 1, 2013.

My (flawless) Canadian credit rating doesn’t directly transfer. Bummer. I was hoping to use it for leverage and become wealthy, like Paula Pant at Afford Anything does. The whole process is going to be a new venture. As outlined in a previous post, I’ll bring home close to the median U.S. household income for the next 3 years of residency.

That’s enough filler. I’ll cut to the chase. 

I’ve been mulling over the idea for a while, but I needed to find the right capitalists. Confident that the principals of CYC are up to the task, I have an opportunity for your corporation:

Lend me $150,000 to transfer a portion of my medical school debt once I move to the U.S. for residency training.

Transferring a portion of my student loans to a U.S. lender is daunting. I don’t have the contacts to find alternative credit at comparable rates.

Most private U.S. lenders offer 7-9% and are surprised when I refuse and tell them they’re missing an opportunity. They probably don’t have a printed form titled “Financially Literate Young Doctor from Canada Applying for U.S. Credit Right Out of the Gate.” No one answering the 1-800 numbers understands what I’m asking for, because it’s unconventional. Credit unions are rumored to be the place to go if you want an “alternative approach,” but I’m sick of dealing with mid-level managers who don’t have any independent decision-making capacity within their organizations.

I’m offering you a chance to be that lender.

Here’s the plan: One year from my residency start date on July 1, 2013, I’m going to send you an e-mail.

I’ll include a listing of my earnings and expenditures for 1 year. I will have $5,000 in liquid assets, I will have a zero credit card balance (naturally), and I’ll include my monthly cash flows (including pay stubs) to prove that I can properly allocate resources and control my cash. I’ll be ashamed if I get a large income tax refund, because I don’t lend my money interest-free. Nor should any of your readers.

This is my financial situation as of March 2013:

Current assets:

M.D. Augmented by an uncommonly strong work ethic. Professional and personal references not required. They’ve been rendered unnecessary by a few pieces of paper. In this case, official copies of USMLE scores in comparison to the national mean, given a standard deviation. Medical school (and most things in life) requires far more hard work than raw mental horsepower. I’m not that smart. You read how long it took me to figure out that my student debt was leverage, and not a thing that goes “bump” in the night.

A car. I don’t count my car as an asset since it’s not directly involved in making me money. But that’s me. You don’t seem like the accounting type, but if you are, my wife owns a nondescript one. We share. Ask me sometime (for your readers’ benefit) why she’s the registered owner and listed as the primary driver.

An emergency fund. Just kidding. No one who actually understands money has one.

 

Current liabilities:

($37,380) in Canadian federal student loans. In case you thought your government cornered the market on giving away money beginning January 2008, our government does too. Thanks, Harper. The turtleneck sweaters you wear underneath blazers to meet international leaders really send the signal that Canadians should be taken seriously. Or is that a dickey?

($141,995.19) on a student line of credit with a $150,000 limit. This is what I’m looking to transfer.

($38,026.00) on another student line of credit.

Net worth:

($217,401.19)

Alternatively, you’ll see the investment opportunity right now and take the money off the table and put it in your pocket. Then, write a blog about how the CYC principals put their money where their mouth is, and float a $150,000 loan at a fixed rate and term I’m willing to negotiate. We can chat about the specifics from now until when I start working in July. I won’t pay a dime in origination fees, though, since I found you. I might even consult my crude compatriot for advice while we hammer out the details, if he would only stop wasting our time objectifying women on his blog.

Our back-and-forth negotiation can occupy the pages of your outstanding blog to educate your readers how to think and invest like a wealthy person, and not like a debt slave. Over the next few years, you can periodically post about our arrangement, and create a case-study on what’s possible through hard work and prudent financial decisions. In doing so, you may find yourself a collective candidate for Financial Retard of the Month and stop flogging this dead horseYou may also find MD to be an additional candidate for Man of the Year and delay honoring Wes Welker until next year. He’s further proof that hardworking people who refuse to accept mediocrity can get ahead. Is that in your book? If it isn’t, it should be.

Win-win-win. I’m including your readers here.

Another idea: Have your readers cast a vote on your options once they’re fully fleshed out if you really want to know how intelligent they are. 

I’ll fully submit to the process of due diligence, and I’ll send you the pertinent information once things have been negotiated. I can even prove I completed my undergraduate studies debt-free, like our new heroes Steve Boedefeld and Zack Tolmie. Remember them*?

Then, down the road, we’ll go into business together.

I’ll find creditworthy medical students and residents and design a better risk model than most private lenders use. You source the capital, and I’ll broker the deals. I love my day job, but why not apply a little effort and put our money to work for us? If you know someone else who’s interested and would add value to the venture, let them in. 

If none of these options appeal to you and your hard-earned capital is better placed elsewhere, your readers would benefit from reading your rationale.

While you evaluate the proposal from my perspective, I’ll do the same and evaluate it from yours. That’s great advice I read somewhere.

So you know I mean business, I’ve attached a picture of my wife and me.

 

*I mean it. These guys are (sadly) modern-day heroes.

Carnival of Wealth, Peter J. Buscemi Killed 5 Hookers Edition

He's got the hair, clothing, demeanor, teeth, writing style and most importantly, obliviousness of a real go-getter. Also, he killed 5 hookers.

He’s got the hair, clothing, demeanor, teeth, writing style and most importantly, obliviousness of a real go-getter. Also, he killed 5 hookers.

 

If you’re new here, every Monday we showcase the Carnival of Wealth. It’s an agglomeration of posts from various personal finance bloggers, ranging from the highly technical (such as Beating the Index) to the conversational (Len Penzo). The idea is to introduce you to some other bloggers who might be worth reading, and to give us a respite from devising original content 3 times a week. Some of the submitters engage us and promote the CoW on their own blogs, others send a submission every week and don’t care what we do with it. Why they submit, we’re not sure. The egregious ones will eventually clue in after a week or two of us poking fun at them.

Then there’s white-collar parody (except he’s serious) Peter J. Buscemi of FourQuadrant, the quintuple hooker-killer of our theme. 7 weeks ago, Peter J. sent us his first awkward post. We described him as “writ[ing] like a cloistered academic who can communicate with the outside world only via mutated and unintelligible Corporatespeak[.]”

Peter J. was just getting started. The next week he submitted anew, and after reading that dreck we wrote “zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…huh? Looks like someone’s sat through his share of strategy meetings and now wants to spread the pain.”

The week after that, we fell asleep while reading another of his deathly submissions. Begging for mercy by his post’s final line, we wrote “How do people get to this point? Peter J. presumably grew up in a regular household, populated by ordinary humans. When does someone go from speaking/writing in English to restating everything in whatever neutered and unreadable language the above is? Does it happen suddenly, or gradually?”

Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, and Peter J. is nothing if not consistent. The following week we wrote, “Peter J. writes in a dialect…that makes his message impenetrable. Here, see if you can make it through this paragraph without slipping into a coma:

Go-to-Market Strategy is focused on how the organization will put offerings into the market to reach market penetration, revenue and profitability expectations. This charter is a superset of marketing strategy as it impacts all functions within an organization with the goal of preparing the entire company for market success.

Every Monday, we send a mass email to the submitters that includes a link to the new CoW. Maybe one of these weeks, Peter J. will take time out from his customer acquisition strategizing and brand positioning to bother clicking on it.”

We’re still waiting. Within 7 days he’d submitted yet another lifeless post, one that prompted us to write “the intrepid and relentless Peter J. Buscemi at FourQuadrant brings more of his insufferable business-school verbiage written with functional contempt for his, and by extension our, readers. If you think that’s harsh, give us a better description of this plodding and toneless excerpt[…]”

Our meta-references were becoming meta-meta-references. From last week, “This marks 6 consecutive submissions from Peter J. Buscemi at FourQuadrant, who didn’t say a word the first 4 times we skewered his somniferous prose. Then last week we gave him the coveted opening slot, criticized his work roundly, pointed out that he obviously doesn’t care where said work is being mocked, and yet he got back up on the horse again.We’d say that you’ve got to respect that, but Peter J. isn’t undaunted, he’s merely apathetic.

Where do we go from here? Every week we lambaste his droning and agonizingly wordy style, and every week he submits yet again as if nothing had happened the previous week. It’s not as if we’re doing this behind his back. The CoW is publicly visible, and we even send him an email every Monday with a link to the Carnival.”

That tied the record of 6 consecutive mocked posts. Would he reach 7?

Indeed he would, and has. Peter J. Buscemi is to bad blog posts what Nolan Ryan is to no-hitters and what Sir Georg Solti is to Grammys. This week, Peter J. explains how to write a cold calling script for your sales team. Of course it takes him 8 paragraphs to say as much, and we wonder if anyone could ever sell anything with a script written by the most loquaciously impotent man on the planet (who, by the way, was recently stopped with the decomposing bodies of 5 hookers in his BMW.)

The Inside Sales (Telemarketing, Telesales, Sales Development) Representatives also provide key feedback to the demand creation planning team on which programs are working. The Inside Sales (Telemarketing, Telesales, Sales Development) Reps provide valuable feedback to product marketing on whether messaging and positioning is or is not resonating with prospects. Inside Sales (Telemarketing, Telesales, Sales Development) Reps also share competitive insights gleaned, help keep FAQs current, and communication prospects’ perceptions on functionality and price.

The tin ear that writes this antiseptic garbage and expects it to enthrall an audience is attached to the head of a man who proves every week that he’s the opposite of perceptive. Peter J., it’s nothing personal, but your reach is so insignificant and your influence so nonexistent that we can say uncomplimentary and gradually more scandalous things about you every week yet it’s never gotten back to you. (Either that or it’s our site that’s inconsequential, and if that’s the case then why are you submitting to us every week?) Our conclusion? No one cares, because no one but masochistic us has ever made it to the second sentence of a Peter J. Buscemi piece.

An effective call guide for Inside Sales Training prepares Inside Sales, Telemarketing, Telesales or Sales Development Representatives with cold calling techniques to make cold calls

First of all, if you did a shot every time Peter J. wrote “Telemarketing, Telesales, (or) Sales Development” you’d be urinating on the Alamo and flashing passersby by now. Beyond that, let’s break down that last monstrosity of a sentence fragment. So a guide for telling employees how to make cold calls should “prepare (them) with cold calling techniques”? Whatever for? Oh, “to make cold calls”. Got it. Well, now that you put it so succinctly, how could we miss it?

Poor, redundant, passive, and just plain boring communication is society’s bane. We’re not saying everyone has to be J.K. Rowling, but holy Christ that Peter J. Buscemi can take a topic and turn it brown.  What is the point of writing if you have nothing to say and no capability to convey it anyway? This post has it all: subheadings, a chart with more dull subheadings, 7 sets of bullet points and a sad little supplicative entreaty at the end: “If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment…” Peter J. can’t even tell people to leave a comment without being indirect and sheepish about it. What really blows our mind is that he lectures at the University of South Florida. Those poor, helpless students.

Now onto the real submissions. The superb Pauline Paquin at Reach Financial Independence has now officially entered a modified, financial version of the Tyson Zone. She could announce that she’s building a hoverbike factory or opening a chain of breadfruit restaurants and we wouldn’t blink. From her Guatemalan oceanside bunker, L’iconoclaste Français has now decided to invest in a coconut farm. Of course she has. 10 acres in Brazil. She ran the numbers (this is Pauline we’re talking about, she’s not going to invest on a whim) and is looking at a handsome profit if most of her investment goes according to plan.

Harry Campbell at Your PF Pro analyzes whether it’s worth it to move in with your significant other.

Living by yourself is expensive but you can immediately cut your rent in half by living with another person.

The rest of the post is more insightful than that quote, we swear.

[Post rejected because it came from OC-repair.com, which is Orange County (California) Appliance Repair. Here’s how the author pitched it to us:

The Electrolux UltraClean Washer has a 15kg capacity and comes in a top loader model. Ultrasound is a growing technology as it is eco-friendly. This means many products with the same feature may soon come out in the future.]

Off-topic, draws an inference between ecological benignity and popularity, and uses metric units. Yeah, we’ll run that.

“Bill Smith” may be a pseudonym, but at least he’s on topic. The man behind 2014 Taxes gives us a semi-literate post about claiming dependents.

Dividend Growth Investor looks at companies that pay uncommonly high dividends with respect to diluted earnings. Which is never sustainable, like a baseball player leading the majors with an .800 average one day into the season.

Who doesn’t like a series of “top tips”? From Betsy Fallwell at Blogging Banks, what to do when you’re buying your first home. Betsy sounds like the kind of rational woman who keeps her emotions in check, and doesn’t at all perpetuate the stereotype of the flighty and demonstrative female:

The first time my husband and I pulled into the driveway of what would ultimately become our new home for a showing with our real estate agent, I burst into tears. They were not unlike the tears I shed when I tried on the dress that would be my wedding gown for the first time

Note to Mr. Fallwell: Never watch Titanic with your wife.

Katrina Lamb, CFP, is presumably made of stronger stuff. The author at Jemstep borrows a quote we’ve never heard before, but like. Playing the market is like 2 mediocre tennis players facing each other. Whoever makes fewer mistakes will do well.

Is your 401(k) too restrictive? Are the fees killing you? Do you even know? Michael at Financial Ramblings explains how to get out of your retirement plan and into a better one. Max out an IRA, put remaining contributions in a 401(k), get the employer match if one exists (free money)…this post is roughly 4000 times better than the typical submission we get here at the CoW, which usually features the author’s first-person story about failing to pay down her debts.

We wouldn’t make fun of academics if they all had as much real-world knowledge as Charles Davis at Wallet Hub does. (And he’s a journalism professor, no less.) This week he explains what private mortgage insurance is, how it differs from mortgage interest premia, and why you might have little choice but to spend money on one or the other.

You want to know an easy financial decision you can make that will benefit everyone, especially you? Get your superannuated parents off the couch, and force them to go to the gym and start eating baked skinless chicken breasts and broccoli. Otherwise you could end up like Lynn B. Johnson at Wallet Blog and tens of millions of other Americans, changing adult diapers and wiping up drool. Her story about the hardships suffered by working caregivers makes at least one CYC author grateful to be estranged.

From the lovely Liana Arnold at Card Hub, the dangers of something sinister: tax fraud. Someone paying your taxes for you might sound like the most eleemosynary gesture imaginable, but not when that other person is using your Social Security number and making you the unsuspecting victim of fraud.

And we’re done. Thanks for reading, see you tomorrow.