I Hate(d) Myself And I Want(ed) To Die

 

A sentiment you'd have too if you couldn't drive

A sentiment you’d have too, if you couldn’t drive

 

A couple of weeks ago your humble (now humbler than ever) blogger spent money on something so unspeakably foul, so indicative of a life gone wrong, that even confessing it here today doesn’t feel cathartic at all. It just feels dirty and shameful.

Street drugs? (Laughs.) No. Far, far worse than that. The services of a prostitute? Please. At least that would feel pleasurable, or ought to in theory.

I rode a bus.

An actual public bus. With a bench where you and the other losers wait, and a little box where you put your fare in, and everything. What’s even worse is that I should have ridden it twice. Here’s why:

A little background. Every December, CYC moves its operations to its seasonal headquarters on Maui. If you’ve never been to Maui, the island embraces a lifestyle unlike any other in the United States. Even if you’ve been to Hawaii, but only visited Waikiki, you still haven’t experienced anything quite like the soporific existence you get on the Valley Isle. The social norms that predominate on the Mainland and in most other outposts of Western culture just don’t apply. Hippies flourish here, and it seems every other Caucasian woman works as an energy healer. On the positive side, you can go into literally any establishment – 5-star restaurant, church, court – wearing clothes that you’d normally wear to wash your car or go to the gym in. Shoes are often optional, and no one looks twice if you happen to have forgotten your shirt at home.

Maui also embodies a famous directive about wealth, one of the very few pieces of received wisdom that isn’t a load of dross. It takes many variants, but our favorite is this: Live in the most expensive place you can afford. Drive the cheapest car you’re willing to be seen in. On Maui that means a 1994 Taurus with a wonky AM radio, hit-and-miss power windows, and 100,000 miles on it. The kind of thing you wouldn’t want to be caught dead in on the North American continent north of the Rio Grande, but on Maui it’s just a mode of transportation. Besides, there are no freeways on the island and just a sole 6-mile stretch of divided highway. It’s impossible to drive 80 miles an hour on Maui, which is why the locals laugh at the image-conscious visitors who rent sports cars that never make it into overdrive. CYC headquarters is close enough to shops and other businesses that the principals can make do with just the one car: they manage to share the Taurus without either ever feeling marooned.

Anyhow, one day the hit-and-miss power windows missed and stayed that way. The body shop is 5 miles away, and the car had to stay overnight, so the principals dropped it off and then walked a mile or so into town to catch a cab.

8 minutes and $40 later, we returned home dumbfounded. The idea to take a cab was reflexive – it’s too far to walk home, and you can’t fit one bicycle in the Taurus, let alone two, so what other option is there? Honestly, we would have thought about taking a hovercraft or the Space Shuttle home before contemplating public transportation. But still, $40. There’s got to be a better way.

Your humble blogger, who lost a coin flip and had to retrieve the car the next morning, broke down and looked at the bus schedule. There’s a stop next door? And a single transfer? And another stop a short walk from the body shop? How hard can this be, especially considering that any 15-year-old can do it?

Damned if it wasn’t just like riding a bus was back in high school, when one’s options and wealth are far more limited than they are in adulthood. The same dejected regulars were on board, the ones who stared straight ahead and seemed incapable of conversation anyway. Every ad on the bus – every ad, without exception – was for a government agency of some sort. If you acted upon every ad you saw, you’d have enrolled your kids on food stamps, taken your reusable cloth bag to the county liquor store, applied to be a police officer, conserved water, moved into taxpayer-subsidized housing, and enjoyed a more active life by quitting smoking.

The trip was uneventful, and that’s a good thing. So were the unbroken $20 bills in the CYC wallet.

There’s a reason why Rupert Murdoch doesn’t take the bus. Time is money, and the more valuable your time is, the faster you need to get where you’re going. But on a bucolic island when the day couldn’t be spent at the beach anyway (because the car was in the shop)? 20 minutes on a bus to save $38 was more than worth it.

Talk about your domain dependence. The same non-Sinophone traveler who had no problem navigating the subways of Beijing (remember the shapes of the logograms at the station where you got on, and note where the corresponding ones are on the route map) didn’t even consider taking the equivalent form of transportation in a town he was utterly familiar with.

How do you apply this to your own life? Don’t instinctively go with expensive convenience, when cheap won’t kill you and really isn’t that much of a hassle. We don’t hammer on frugality on this site, as most personal finance sites do, but taking a taxi when an uncomplicated bus route will do the job can be a stark waste of money. Still, try not to ride a bus more than once a decade or so.

Let’s Get Preachy!

He probably wasn't thrilled about the naked babies, either

He probably wasn’t thrilled about the naked midgets, either

 

Today’s post summarized in one line:
God Wants You To Get Out Of The Soup Kitchen And Move To A Better Neighborhood.

How is it possible for a Christian, or a Jew, or a Zoroastrian, to reconcile the pursuit of wealth with the austerity that’s supposed to be part of honoring God?

Question rejected because of a false premise. Where did God say you’re supposed to be poor?

Let’s focus on Christians, not only because they outnumber everyone else but because their book of faith reads from left to right. Matthew 19:24 is the passage about the camel going through the eye of the needle, a line some people use to justify being poor. The problem is that Christ is referencing only the rich in the passage; that is to say, he’s not referencing the poor. His point is that yes, it’s hard for rich people to get into heaven. It’s hard for anyone to get into heaven. You have to resist temptation, not be a douche, not kill people, not even maim them, not cheat and steal, etc. In the same way that while it’s hard for right-handed pitchers to make the majors, it’s not a walk in the cake* for lefties either. Charles Manson makes $1 an hour at Corcoran State Prison.

The ironic thing is that the very next verse in the Bible opens the parable of the workers in the vineyard. The moral to which is that the rich landowner gets to do what he wants with his own money, and the workers he hired should keep quiet and honor their commitments to him (assuming, of course, that he honors his to them.)

It’s easy, actually simplistic, to regard commerce and faith as incompatible. Maybe the mindset stems from people honoring the Sabbath on a day that they don’t traditionally work, except that’s backwards: people don’t traditionally work on a day reserved as the Sabbath. Besides, working on Sunday (or Saturday, if you ever attended summer camp) is not uncommon, nor is it an affront to any deity.

What are you doing when you’re working or otherwise earning money? You’re creating wealth – offering a good or service for remuneration. The buyer benefits from your ingenuity or toil, and you benefit or you wouldn’t be doing it in the first place. Again, money is just an artifice. If we didn’t have it as a convenient medium to represent value, the only difference would be that after our next shift serving lemonade at Hot Dog On A Stick, we’d be receiving movie tickets and maybe a couple of shirts instead of a check.

Yes, Christ chased the forex traders out of the temple. (One chapter later in Matthew, no less.) But only because them plying their trade there was an affront to propriety and solemnity. Like singing karaoke in an emergency room, or playing beer pong at the office. There’s a time and a place. He wasn’t condemning the money-changers’ profession in and of itself.

Still, people use their faith as an excuse for being poor because…

Because people will use anything as an excuse for being poor. “I believe in intangible riches, the kind that don’t inspire jealousy and other bad feelings.” “The smile on my child’s face, that’s better than any amount of money.” “Mo’ money, mo’ problems.” And our favorite, “(The love of) money is the root of all evil.”

Oh, you sanctimonious titmouse. The love of money is also the root of all good. One more time: money is nothing more a medium of exchange. A representation of wealth. The folks who invented Plumpy’nut and the Versatile RT490 combine harvester turned a profit while doing more than almost anyone to fight global misery. And that’s legitimate, 3rd World misery, not the 1st World kind that involves tragedies like having split ends while not being able to find the right conditioner.

The aforementioned industrialists have been rewarded handsomely. The RT 490’s manufacturers made $16 million in net earnings last year. Did they deserve it? How many machines have you sold to Nigerian farmers that help them become exponentially more productive and save them from excruciating labor? Yeah, none. We thought so.

Parse it hard enough, and you can find a financial message in just about any Bible verse. Paul Zane Pilzer wrote a book called God Wants You To Be Rich, and the argument is the same: it’s a bountiful world, and your marketable skills help make it so. You’re not only entitled, but practically obligated, to develop and exploit those skills. And enjoy the concomitant rewards. And save the guilt and unease for your actual transgressions against nature. Material wealth is only sinful if you come by it dishonestly.

(Hat tip to one of our, for lack of a better word, personal finance coreligionists for inspiring this post.)

*Mixed metaphor ⒸControl Your Cash 2013.