Carnival of Wealth, Office Memo Edition

America needs more passive-aggression.

America needs more passive-aggression.

A friend of CYC works for a national conglomerate that you’ve definitely heard of and have likely patronized. He forwarded us this “all users” memo:

Yesterday, we had an incident in our communal microwave where popcorn was burnt to an undesirable crisp state and exposed us to unhealthy fumes as well as a terrible odor. We must be careful when we use the microwave. Please follow the microwave instructions shown on your food packaging label.
If you use the microwave please clean it right after using it. Experts say microwave ovens — especially in the office — are a breeding ground for bacteria and require regular cleaning and airing.
To keep the microwave oven clean and smelling fine, please wipe it down after you use it. Damp paper towel with soap and water will do just fine and keep the microwave oven door open in between uses to help cut back on lingering odors.
Don’t forget to cover your food to prevent splatters. Use plastic wrap, resting it on top of the container — not touching the food or sealing the container — to create steam that heats food quickly and kills bacteria. Just be sure to create a vent, or your food will explode.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

And you wonder why we rail against the corporate lifestyle. Who would want to work under such conditions, where some human resources harpy is writing patronizing notes like that? Verbosity, condescension, every hallmark of the modern workplace is there. Why couldn’t the note have read:

If you make the microwave dirty, clean it.

And if she absolutely had to stretch it out to 2 sentences:

Apologies to the people who clean up after themselves: this email isn’t for you.

Wait, there’s more. The very next day, our friend forwarded us this:

With regards to the refrigerator, all employees are to put their names on their lunches, snacks, etc….and any food (or leftovers) that is unmarked and rotten will be tossed on Fridays at 5pm. Please do not take any food from the refrigerator that is not yours. Employees bring specific food for themselves and should be able to look forward to having it without worries.
On a another note, Patrick went out and bought a new microwave for the kitchen. Thank you Patrick!
I kindly ask that if you use the microwave please clean it and follow the tips mentioned in my previous email.
Thank you for your cooperation!

We offered our friend $50 to defecate in the new microwave.

A message to office parents (you know who you are.) You think everyone else is a child, and you write these prolix emails because you don’t want anyone to miss a single word of your disappointment, nor fail to grasp how you’re just so much more responsible and mature than everyone else. Go to hell. For the rest of you, onto the Carnival:

PKamp3 at DQYDJ.net gets top billing today because he bought a copy of our book. He presents another of his renowned calculators: with this one, you enter the variables and figure out how long it’ll take before you’re objectively rich. We’re mature enough that we’re not intimidated by a blogger who’s way smarter and more talented than us. Don’t just read this post, read DQYDJ’s entire archives.

Emily Guy Birken at One Smart Dollar reinforces what we’ve been saying for…well, months that have turned into years. The combination of low home prices and mortgage rates is unprecedented. Buy some real estate. And get a 15-year mortgage. Pro tip: Fast forward past her first 2 pointless paragraphs, which serve no purpose. Head straight for the 3rd one, which is a rich buffet of tired phrasing. She wrote “no matter how you slice it” and “nothing to sneeze at” in consecutive lines. Hey, speaking of words we’ve read before…

After a few weeks’ hiatus, illiterate plagiarizer Eddie at Finance Fox is back for some reason. He took a trip to an auto show and thought that’d be worth sharing. It isn’t.

Plagiarizer? Yeah. Eddie lifts others‘ work, note-for-note. We haven’t checked, but that auto show post probably came from the pages of Car & Driver. We can almost sympathize with this: as a glance at Eddie’s non-ghostwritten posts will confirm, his original work is one level above throwing his feces at a piece of paper until some of the gobbets take the shape of Roman letters. (That’s our last scatological joke today, we promise.) But this is inexcusable. What’s really insulting is that out of the dozen or so people Eddie stole from, he didn’t crib a single word from Control Your Cash. What, we’re not good enough for him? Either that, or he had trouble comprehending our somewhat intellectually demanding posts. Probably the latter.

We’ve never formally banned someone from the CoW before. (And we’ve had some doozies submit, but at least their awful work wasn’t cut-and-paste copies of others’.) So congratulations to Eddie, recipient of the Carnival of Wealth’s first-ever death penalty. But unlike the NCAA, here you can never apply for reinstatement. Goodbye.

(Post rejected because this was how the submitter described it:

While Earning Money Online…Your Vegan Vegetarian Lifestyle Can Help Other People Become Healthier! I know that many of you already know that a vegan vegetarian diet is healthy for you, but did you know that you could also earn money online because of your healthy lifestyle, and help other people become healthier at the same time? Let’s talk about one of the ways you can do this.

Submitters, it’s the Carnival of Wealth. Not the Carnival of Flotsam. But points for trying to fuse diet tips with personal finance.)

You know what really makes carnival hosts feel like this is all worth it? When a submitter continues to submit post after post even after we make relentless fun of him every week. Peter J. Buscemi of FourQuadrant has submitted 4 weeks in a row and is as long-winded as the office manager cited above, plus Peter J. writes in a dialect of Higher Corporatespeak that makes his message impenetrable. Here, see if you can make it through this paragraph without slipping into a coma:

Go-to-Market Strategy is focused on how the organization will put offerings into the market to reach market penetration, revenue and profitability expectations. This charter is a superset of marketing strategy as it impacts all functions within an organization with the goal of preparing the entire company for market success.

Every Monday, we send a mass email to the submitters that includes a link to the new CoW. Maybe one of these weeks, Peter J. will take time out from his customer acquisition strategizing and brand positioning to bother clicking on it. Until then, keep ’em coming, you magnificent unreadable bastard.

The next 2 submissions in the hopper are a good one and a dismal one. Which do you want first? If we start with the good one, it’ll break the streak. But if we give you the bad one first, it’ll make you appreciate the good one all the more when you finally get to read it.

So it’s settled, then. Josh at Becoming Your Own Bank also submits every week, and every time he does we mention that his family’s business – whole life insurance – is a reprehensible one. We even trashed his dad’s (uncle’s?) book a couple of years ago. We didn’t do it to be cruel, but rather because it belonged in a landfill. Josh’s subject matter this week isn’t too horrible – the danger of fiat money and fractional-reserve banking – but he takes way too long to get to the point and, of course, ties it in to whole life insurance by the end of the post. Also, this post is an interview but it’s formatted so badly that it’s impossible to tell which voice is the writer’s and which is the subject’s. Aside from that, awesome post.

As promised, here’s the good submission. Remember good submissions? We do, faintly. Pauline Paquin at Reach Financial Independence reminds us that the whole point of self-determination is having options. Mlle. Paquin moved to the Guatemalan coast and is leveraging things beautifully, taking advantage of low wages and prices to live in relative comfort with plenty of freedom. She explains what she chooses to spend money on, and what she elects to do herself – a solution to a linear programming problem that maximizes both her money and her time. We need more Paulines.

Back to the garbage. William at Quote Me A Price returns a mere 7 days after we told you to, and we quote, “avoid (his company) like anthrax.” After much introspection, we’ve decided to take his post this week as the compliment that it is. Clearly, he’s implying that the Carnival of Wealth is such a great place to submit to that it’s worth any verbal skewering. Anyhow, William wants to buy your annuity. He writes the same post every week, but at least he’s plagiarizing himself and not others.

Is this our worst CoW yet? Bottom 5, anyway.

A respite. Harry Campbell at Your PF Pro points out that you can add blood – actual human blood – to the list of commodities that your elected representatives control the price of, instead of allowing buyers and sellers to come to mutual agreement. The Food and Drug Administration (How is this under their purview? Is blood a drug, or food?) doesn’t allow compensation of more than $25 a pint. And then has the nerve to say that there’s a shortage. Even better, Harry’s local blood bank charges its customers 12 times that once they drain his veins.

Look who’s back! It’s Neal Frankle at Wealth Pilgrim. Our resident genius Certified Financial Planner explains what proprietary funds are, what’s wrong with them, and why you might be invested in one without even knowing it.

Paula Pant of Afford Anything unveils one of finance’s fundamental truths, so obvious that most of you miss it. Emotion has no place with regard to money. None whatsoever. (We’re paraphrasing.) In that respect, personal finance is almost a hard science – organic chemistry and particle physics don’t care how you’re feeling or whether you’re “mentally in a bad place”, and neither does your money. Except Paula stated that more succinctly than we could.

From Michael at Financial Ramblings, why companies split their stock.

There are pros to payday loans? Not just cons? John Kiernan at Card Hub conducts an interview with an academic who tells a story of a payday lender attempting to sell a loan to a retard (a real one.) Yes, payday loans are stupid. That’s why you need the government to prohibit you from getting one, because you can’t be expected to do it yourself.

Another financial product/service to avoid is penny stocks, and if the reasons aren’t obvious, Kevin Mulligan at Free From Broke gives them to you but good. That Canadian mining stock that’s trading at 14¢ a share isn’t going to rise to $1, and in the unlikely event that it does you’ll be too greedy to cash out anyway.

From Ross Garner at Wallet Hub, did you know there’s a reverse mortgage crisis in addition to the conventional one? The Federal Housing Administration overleveraged taxpayers itself and has decided to suspend its most popular reverse mortgage program. There is nothing that government can’t screw up. But yeah, keep voting for the status quo.

Couldn’t the S&P have used another expression? Dividend bigwigs? Dividend bluebloods? Anything other than “dividend aristocrats”, which never fails to make us giggle? Dividend Growth Investor looks at Standard & Poor’s definitive list, and finds that it’s anything but definitive.

If any submitter could add a useful word to our vocabulary, it’s Jason at Hull Financial Planning. Apophenia is the phenomenon of divining patterns in random data where none exist. (That’s not the Virgin Mary’s face in a church window. This is the Virgin Mary’s face in a church window.) Jason argues that there’s too much information out there, and that you’re better off turning off CNBC or only watching in minute doses. (You can pronounce that ˈmin-it or mī-ˈnüt, it doesn’t matter which.) Besides, you should be watching Fox Business anyway, but mostly because of this.

Finally, from Lynn B. Johnson at Wallet Blog: the Paradox of Medicaid. She had to get her Parkinson’s-stricken mom into a nursing home, and to qualify for Medicaid (as opposed to the 3 but not 4 classes of Medicare that her mom qualified for) Lynn had to liquidate her mom’s assets and prepay some expenses. Our federal government’s functionaries made Lynn pay for her mother’s eventual funeral, just one of several ghoulish flaming hoops she had to leap through. (Lynn, that is. Her mother’s in no condition to jump through even a non-flaming hoop.) As Lynn puts it,

Medicaid…exists so that people who are stricken with disease and poverty can receive healthcare, but the stress and bureaucracy of negotiating the application process leaves you wanting to die.

A message to subpar personal finance bloggers. Create imagery as adeptly as Lynn does, while still giving full-time care to a mentally compromised mother:

The nursing-home financial officer, whom I’ll call Glinda for her magical powers of remaining calm in the face of bureaucracy,

And we’ll stop making fun of you.

Thanks for coming. Check us out on Investopedia. (Special cross-promotional treat, check us out in Nevada Magazine this week.) New post Wednesday. And Friday. ‘Til then.

February’s (Financial) Retard of the Month

 

Breakfast (and lunch, and dinner) of Champions.

Breakfast (and lunch, and dinner) of Champions.

 

These never get old, do they? We could run with one of these for our (Financial) Retard of the Month, every month, until the sun burns itself out. We’d never exhaust the supply. The Indebted Overeducated Female Personal Finance Blogger is now officially a stock character, cousin to the Absent-Minded Professor, the Renegade Cop Who Plays By His Own Rules, the Hooker with a Heart of Gold and the Wise Asian Kung Fu Instructor.

Presenting Catherine at Plunged In Debt, not to be confused with Blogging Away Debt, Our Debt Blog, Debt Sucks Blog, My Journey To Eliminate Debt, The Debt Princess, So Over Debt, etc.

How far in debt is Catherine? Oh, not that much. Just $300,000. She explains her story:

I wanted to go to university, actually it wasn’t an option, I was going to university

(Note: “University” is the Canadian colloquial term for what Americans call “college”. In Canada, “college” is the equivalent of “community college” in the U.S. Also, they call Canadian bacon “back bacon” and call a house a “hoose”.)

Wait. Why? Why was it “not an option”? She doesn’t explain, but given that it was mandatory, she must have saved up enough money to pay for it, right?

I just didn’t have any money to pay for it.

That’s the very next line, by the way. But Catherine has a point. Why should you be denied something just because you can’t afford it? That’s the same argument we’re going to use when we visit our plastic surgeon and demand rhinoplasties.

By the end of my undergraduate degree I managed to rack up $32,000 in student debt and probably $2,000 in consumer/credit card debt.

Catherine is exceedingly detailed in the composition of her family, her insistence on getting a tertiary education, etc., but she omits one crucial detail. Exactly what was that degree in? It shouldn’t matter. One’s as good as the next, right?

Catherine mentions, when prompted by a commenter, that her undergraduate degree is in biology. She started what should be the productive part of her life $34,000 in the hole. Or $34,000 poorer than her high school classmates who didn’t earn useless degrees.

Here’s the funniest line we’ve ever quoted in the Retard of the Month series:

What’s even worse is that, although no education is wasted, my degree wasn’t going to get me much beyond a minimum wage job

Read that again. Here:

What’s even worse is that, although no education is wasted, my degree wasn’t going to get me much beyond a minimum wage job

So an education that isn’t “going to get (you) much beyond a minimum wage job” isn’t wasted. Chew on that for a minute. Now swallow.

Imagine buying a brand-new house that, it turns out, was built by an unlicensed contractor who used balsa wood for the frame and didn’t know how to reinforce a load-bearing wall. One day when you’re at work (at your minimum-wage retail job), the whole thing comes crashing down. But it’s cool, because no house is wasted.

Don’t be stupid. You can’t compare a commodity like a house to something as important as an education.

Why not? You can talk about intangibility all you want, but both the house and the degree are a commodity to someone. Try paying your tuition bill with poetry and freshly picked hydrangeas if you don’t believe us. You wouldn’t expect a consumer good to be worth thousands less than you paid for it, yet people implicitly expect their educations to be worth less than they paid for them all the freaking time. Catherine just admitted as much.

To her credit, she came to her senses and realized that despite her B.S., and also her Bachelor of Science degree, she needed to earn money and immediately:

the only option I had was to further my education.

Or not.

So Catherine became a dental hygienist. We’ll leave out some intermediate details, but just know that she finishes up by saying:

By the end of my second degree, before my life had started, I now had $106,000 in debt.

She’s married. Let’s read about her rosy-cheeked “hubby” (her emasculating term, not ours):

Hubby went to university, then college, racking up a total of about $10,000 total in line of credit and student loan debt. He has a credit card maxed at $2,000

He went to university first? Again, no mention of his major. But, as the above sentence ends:

not a huge deal.

Compared to $106,000 in debt, no. Kind of like how a person who’s 40 pounds overweight can point to Manuel Uribe and say, “My waistline? Not a huge deal.”

we also owe another approximate $5,000 in various credit that we can’t really account for.

By “can’t really account for”, does she mean “can’t really justify”, or can she literally not account for it, i.e. can’t tell you where it came from? Oh well, who cares? It’s just $5,000.

now that we have a baby (and I’m on maternity leave) extra funds for additional payments beyond the minimum for credit cards is near impossible.

Now they’ve gone from being merely stupid to being straight-up bad human beings. Because there’s no better time to have a kid than when you’re $106,000 in debt.

“Who are you to tell her when she should have a baby, you insensitive clod?”

The inescapable truth of the matter is that babies cost money. Lots of money. Not only that, they preclude your ability to earn further money.

How do we know this? A) It’s obvious and 2) Catherine said so herself (in a manner of speaking.) A couple of days ago Plunged In Debt ran this lousy sponsored post. Here’s the money quote from the Indian remote assistant who wrote it:

[Y]ou have to consider that raising children will increase your family’s monthly expenses dramatically. Secondly, just the medical bills from giving birth alone will rack up a good chunk of debt. If you are not in control of your debt and have a tight budget before you have children, you could quickly find yourselves in a downward financial spiral afterwards.

In 2013, we have bloggers who run sponsored posts that warn you to avoid the detrimental activities that the bloggers themselves proudly undertake. This is what it’s come to.

Still, at the very least, by now Catherine finally figured out that she and Hubby need to be hyperfrugal for the next…well, until their kid is driving and registering to vote.

Not quite. Check out this post, improbably titled “I WILL Partake In Lifestyle Inflation”, and the all-caps emphasizes her point. Catherine lists all the things she’s going to do once she pays off that $300,000, which will never, ever happen. She fantasizes about vacation savings accounts and second cars, much like a maximum-security prisoner will close his eyes and think of Mexican beaches and consensual heterosexual sex.

As for that projected second car, she spends 2 hours a day on the bus, which is depressing enough when you’re in high school. In adulthood it’s just embarrassing.

We’re not in this situation because of any vast overspending or living beyond our means (not to say we haven’t put stuff on credit that we shouldn’t have)

Is there any self-awareness anywhere, or did it all disappear with cassette tapes and floppy disks?

Honey, we hate to be the ones to break this to you, but you’re in this situation ONLY because of vast overspending and living beyond your means. Your parenthetical comment contradicts perfectly everything it follows in that sentence. But hey, you’re going to have a vacation savings account one day. When you’re 130, but still.

From later in her About page:

I’ve always loved…budgeting

We give up. This crossed into self-parody several (Financial) Retards of the Month ago.

Oh, quit fanning yourself on the fainting couch. This isn’t about those nasty 1-percenters at Control Your Cash making fun of the downtrodden. This is about people who willingly, methodically, and purposefully dig themselves a hole, jump inside, throw handfuls of dirt on themselves and then bitch that they’re being buried alive.

If you want to build wealth, the following steps are guaranteed not to work. They are 100% foolproof:

  • Go to college for no particular reason (i.e., just to defer life for 4 if not more years.)
  • Finance said education.
  • Use credit cards for things you can’t afford.
  • And again.
  • Justify your awful mistakes and convince yourself that you’re right. (Catherine says she “doesn’t regret anything”, and if that’s true, why did she bother creating her blog?)

But if you are serious about building wealth, pull your head out and deal with the following unchangeable truths:

  • When your liabilities outnumber your assets, and you subtract the former from the latter to determine your net worth, you’re left with a negative quantity each and every time. You don’t need to go to college, or university, to know this. Any elementary school will teach it to you.
  • Therefore, it makes sense to acquire as many assets as possible while eliminating as many liabilities as possible.
  • A (post-secondary, nonspecific) education is not an asset in any financial sense. Its benefits are largely psychological. If you don’t believe this, reread the excerpts from Catherine’s delusional blog.
  • A debt is a liability, if you don’t have any cash flow to cover it. Catherine and Hubby don’t, or they’d have paid off their credit cards and student loans by now.
  • If you concentrate on acquiring assets (real estate, retirement accounts, mutual funds, securities) and cut out as many liabilities (credit card balances, etc.) as possible, you’ll build wealth in spite of yourself.
  • If you start off by incurring a giant debt (e.g. a 6-digit tuition + interest bill) before you begin earning money, it’s like lining up for a 100-meter dash 20 yards behind the start line and the other competitors. If you do this, it means you want to lose. You want to be broke. In fact, you want to be less than broke. Admitting this is the first step, but why would anyone want to admit it? It’s depressing!
  • Convincing yourself that your bad decisions are good doesn’t make them so.

Buying our book is a cheap step in the right direction.

Her grammar needs work, too.