Us 1, American Express 0

This week’s Friday recap comes from Credit Card Chaser, an erudite blog about…well, you can probably discern its topic of choice. Again, updated content in red, after the fold. But first, this brings up an aside to the aside. A year ago, we here at Control Your Cash were disappointed with our visitorship. (The quantity, not the quality. We enjoy all of you, except that Nicole and/or Maggie hoyden.) To get more visitors, we began writing guest posts for every personal finance blog with a higher Alexa ranking than ours. At the time, there were seemingly billions of such sites, and in reality, a few dozen. Credit Card Chaser was one of the first ones we submitted to. Now, our ranking’s higher than theirs. Not that this is a contest. Except it is.

**This post is featured in the Best of Credit Cards and Money Carnival-Shocking Credit Card Factoids Edition**

They call it "swiping" for a reason

The average American household receives a credit card offer every 10 days. (If you’re on Capital One’s mailing list, more like every 10 hours.) That average American household accepts a lot of those offers, and carries a balance of about $10,000 on an average of 12 cards, which is at least 10 too many. The average interest rate on credit cards is around 18%. Twenty percent of those cards are maxed out, and 35% of their holders pay a monthly late charge. (Those numbers have certainly changed by a basis point or two, but the details haven’t. If you’re not getting credit card offers, you’re living off the land in either the Bob Marshall Wilderness or the Alaskan Bush.)

A helpful rule in your economic life is to think about every transaction from the other party’s perspective. In this case, look at the handsome annuity that your credit card balance becomes in the eyes of the card issuer. And if you can find an investment that pays a consistent 18%, let me know. Not only will I refund you the price of my book, I’ll retire from creating personal finance books and put all my money in that investment instead.

If you couldn’t pay your bills in 18th century England, you didn’t get to “call and work something out,” nor could you sue in civil court because your bank made its credit card application so pretty and the envelope so easy to open that you couldn’t say no. Instead, you went to debtor’s prison. Sometimes it seems as though the threat of incarceration might be the only way to get modern Americans to spend with discretion. You’re carrying more debt now than when you were 15 and working at Hot Dog On A Stick. Ever wonder why?

Money is a commodity, but it’s also a tool. A tool that can help you build a house, a career, a life. Lose control of your money, and it’s the credit card issuer that’ll determine how hard your nails will be hammered and how frequently. So when you get a mailer that reads:

“Instead of 18.9%, apply now and we’ll give you a fabulously low rate of 14.9%!”

understand that means

“We’d like an investment that pays 18.9%, but then we’d also like it to rain beer. An investment that pays 14.9% is still fantastic, though. Almost no investment in the world can guarantee that, besides the atrocious saving habits of the American public.”

Never carry a credit card balance. Sacrifice a month’s groceries and beg for orange peels if you have to. Regard paying your bill in full every month as an imperative no less important than locking your door every time you leave home. Depending on what neighborhood you live in, doing the former could save you more money than doing the latter.

If you carry no balance, it costs the issuer to keep you around. You’re a low-revenue customer. (Or better yet, a non-revenue customer.) Let the irresponsible borrowers with the $25,000 balances pay the salary of the MasterCard CEO and put the fuel in VISA’s corporate jets.

With a zero balance, you can look at the issuer/borrower relationship in a new light. You’ll notice that credit card companies plug their low interest rates and balance transfer rates like they’re being eleemosynary bighearts. “Act now, and pay just 9.9% on balance transfers!”

In other words, if you’re irresponsible enough to have rung up debt on a competitor’s card, come to us. You’ve proven yourself to be a juicy fish. You’re actually far better than that, because a 50-pound chinook salmon can only be eaten once. We can feed off your bloated carcass again and again. The issuer is saying, “Hooked on cocaine? That’s for losers. Instead, give our pure crystal meth a taste and you’ll never go back.”

If you pay in full, annual percentage rates and interest-free introductory periods become meaningless. The credit card company has to profit off someone. Let it be the ill-prepared next person, not you.

The longer your record of paying your balance in full, the bigger the limits your issuer should allow. Most introductory credit cards will only let you charge up to, say, $3,000. After you’ve paid in full for a few months, they’ll increase your limits. This isn’t to reward you for being a profitable customer, as you’re anything but. It’s in the hope you’ll slip up, charge more than you can afford, and that’s when they’ve got you. Another debtor on the hook.

This is not a condemnation of credit cards, says a man who would use his Hilton Honors AmEx at the neighbor girl’s lemonade stand if she’d only accept it (62,760 points and counting!) (Now 81,320. But that changes monthly, and I’ve stayed at more Hampton Inns in the past year than I care to remember.) Credit cards are wonderful. They’re convenient, discreet, trackable, replaceable and inconspicuous in ways cash can never be. But if you use them without regard to their possible consequences, you’re the equivalent of a parent who thinks her baby’s nursery has just the right mix of temperature and humidity for storing loaded firearms.

Wow. That’s the least editing we’ve had to do on a reconstituted post since we started this CYC Flashback thing. The wisdom is thus timeless: carrying a credit card balance = sheer and unadulterated idiocy.

**This post is featured in the Totally Money Blog Carnival-Outrageous Tax Deduction Edition**

Fixed-rate mortgages are boring. Get something fun instead!

Welcome to Recycle Friday. This week, a post that originally ran on LenPenzo.com, updated for posterity.

If this page appears in your mortgage document, RUN. Also, mortgages shouldn't have sines and tangents in them

Should you walk away from your mortgage just because your home depreciated?

So you refinanced. Or bought too much house. You divided the mortgage payments by your income, and decided you could swing something a few percentage points higher than the recommended 25–33 because the market was rising and your house would make you rich just by existing.

You relied on speculation as an investment strategy (not even your own speculation, but other people’s.) But your house got cheaper, maybe cheaper than what you bought it for. That’s called “losing money on an investment,” which happens all the time, but people think it oughtn’t when your bedroom and kitchen are part of the investment.

The market might bounce back. If you’re 7 years in, lots can happen in the remaining 23 on a 30-year mortgage.

When you lose money on a stock, your brokerage account might get wiped out, but no one will see the evidence of this except you. Owe more than your vehicle is worth, and it might get repoed. Fine, tell people you sold it and always wanted to ride the bus instead. But stop making payments on a house, and there’s a letter from the constable on the door, maybe some yellow tape involved – hard to keep that quiet from the neighbors. Also, people getting forcibly removed from “their” houses (it’s yours and not the bank’s only after you pay the entire mortgage) make for striking photo and political opportunities. After all, bankers are evil. Meanwhile, it’s the working stiffs just trying to make ends meet who get raked over the coals. (Wow, a sentence composed entirely of clichés. Mike Lupica approves.)

Some people who make enough to cover the mortgage dump the house anyway – the strategic default. They assume investment values only move in one direction. According to Experian, that includes 20% of defaulters.

This is hiding behind the law. Stop making payments, and it’s not like you’ll be evicted that week. It takes months, even years. The idea here is to take the mortgage payments and put them toward, say, your credit card balance, figuring the lender will gladly renegotiate a contract you signed in order to get some sort of return on its investment.

Some borrowers think this is fine because if the lender kicks you out, it’ll be tough to sell the house to someone else in a down market anyway. The lender at least wants the house to stay lived in.

This is nonsense. Strategic defaults hurt everyone.

A strategic default does to your credit score what Michael Vick did to underperforming fighting dogs. You’ll never be able to borrow either a) again, or b) until Congress and the White House decide that so many people need to improve their credit scores that it just wouldn’t be fair to let some insidious little 3-digit numbers have such power over those people’s lives.

What’s the solution? Well, no politician of either party wants the other accusing him or her of standing by while old ladies and cripples are being kicked out of “their” houses. The government would then essentially renegotiate mortgage contracts, setting caps on future ones and insisting the lenders take less. Under this type of forced renegotiation, the borrowers don’t even have to sack up and face the lenders themselves.

Besides, co-workers, professors, and the blonde lady on TV say defaulting is fine. And for PR reasons, lenders are hunting down deficient borrowers about as aggressively as the feds go after illegal immigrants.

Say you walk away from your mortgage, mail your keys to your lender, then rent somewhere. Your now-former neighbor follows, then a third. No matter how swank a neighborhood you deserted, the lawns turn brown and the pools green because no one’s living in the houses. Which reduces the value of the remaining houses. Now the people who stayed behind and haven’t (yet) defaulted watch their homes’ values decline. Which means they’ll likely owe more than their houses are worth, making it more likely that those folks will default. Continue like this, and you end up with…Detroit.

When you declare bankruptcy, you can renegotiate to protect yourself from creditors. But strategically defaulting is the opposite – you keep all your assets except the house and mortgage.

So what to do? Four choices:

1. Man up, economize and make your payments. You’re obligated to the lender, yourself (to preserve your credit), any kids of yours (unless you don’t think you need to set an example) and society. If you steal from your lender, it doesn’t directly affect the rest of us, but it makes civilization incrementally more difficult to live in—the broken window theory.

You don’t like that answer? It’s a house, for crying out loud. You need somewhere to live. No matter how much value it loses, it’s still better than renting and never building a dime of equity. Stop assuming that because your $100,000 house lost 10% of its value last year, it’ll lose a similar amount next year and by 2022 will be worth -$10,000.

2. Short sale. If you know you can’t make your payments, and you’ve exhausted every possible way of earning or otherwise securing money, call the lender and come clean AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. The lender will sell the house at a loss, just to get you out of there and collect some money. You’ll still be on the hook until the bank resells the house, but that won’t last forever and at least you can stop throwing good money after bad.

3. Ask for a loan modification. It’s begging, but your pride already left a while ago.

4. The Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. Tell the lender, “Look, I can’t make the payments. Let’s not short sell, I’ll just give you the damn thing to get out of this suffocating debt.” This hurts your credit rating the least, and tells the lender not to worry about you being one of those evictees who pours concrete in the toilets and makes off with the copper wire.

And next time, get a vanilla 30-year fixed-rate mortgage.

**This post is featured in the Totally Money Blog Carnival-Valentine Edition**

Why the Self-Employed Are STILL Smarter Than You

Self-employed, Self-determination, Incorporate, Save Taxes, Make Money

Self-employed, kind of. Also he blinked when we asked permission to use the photo

This is an updated version of a post that ran on LenPenzo.com 11 months ago. We’re thinking of doing something similar every Friday, the argument being that a) of our 3 weekly posts, you probably pay the least attention to the Friday one and b) everyone else recycles content once in a while, so why not us? As it stands you’re still getting over 2000 words of freshness weekly. More importantly, we actually edit our stuff. Those 2000+ words are polished to a keen sheen before you get to read them. Otherwise, we’d be like that one chick who cranks out 20 blog posts a week and opens them with insight like “Thanksgiving is a great time to reconnect with family.”

————————————————————————

Who pays a greater share of his income in taxes – Warren Buffett, or his driver? (Actually, Buffett’s so eccentric he probably drives himself. In a 1970 LTD with 8 million miles on it.) Still, posing the question implies its answer. Details below.

Politicians may tout the virtues of our “progressive” tax system, but it doesn’t really favor the poor over the rich.

Nor does it favor the rich over the poor, not when 40% of federal tax receipts come from 1% of the population. Fairly or otherwise, the tax system favors the diligent over the unprepared. (As most things in life, so maybe the system is fair.) Specifically, the system favors independent businesspeople over salaried workers.

This topic requires a book-length explanation (such as the groundbreaking and heretical Control Your Cash), but to summarize, starting your own business lets you enjoy tax advantages wage slaves only dream of. Take two people in the same field, making like incomes, living in the same city (which means their costs of living should be similar), only one owns his own business and the other works for someone else. It’s eminently possible that the latter person’s tax bill is 9 times the former’s.

Declare your independence today, if your career lets you make a horizontal shift to entrepreneurship. If you’re an anesthesiologist, you can’t rent out an office and put up a sign that reads “Mepivacaine Administered Here—Happy Hour 4–7.”  But if you’re an accountant, real estate agent, home inspector, software engineer, attorney* or in any kind of creative profession, you can take advantage of complex tax laws.

This isn’t the kind of entrepreneurship that requires you to open a physical storefront and spend years building a customer base. These are changes you can make now that will immediately impact your bottom line.

I tried to go as long as I could without using the first-person pronoun, but my story illustrates the point. 5 years ago I was working for a decently-sized advertising agency as a senior copywriter, making somewhat more than the nation’s per capita income. One day I ran the numbers and realized I could make more money going out on my own.

I collected most of my new clients, other ad agencies, via word-of-mouth. But most importantly, I took on the very agency I’d left as a client. And charged them about 30% more than they paid me as an employee. There are two components to that: 1) they were underpaying me to begin with, but had to cough up once I exercised my leverage and threatened to walk and B) the daily rate they paid me after the switch was just for the services I rendered – nothing else. It included no employee benefits, no capital expenditures for a workstation, no space reserved for me at the office Christmas party (thank God), no food/clothing/transportation allowance, no 6.2% Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax, no unemployment insurance premium. The responsibility for all that now fell on me.

Which is wonderful. It meant that instead of my former employer enjoying all the possible tax deductions from my labor, I got to take advantage of them. My taxes got a little more complicated – I now had to keep more detailed records, and file quarterly instead of annually – but the benefits grossly outweighed the costs.

It’s easy to get started, but also easy to make mistakes. You don’t want to be a single proprietor. You want to found an S Corporation, a legal entity that protects you from creditors who are forbidden from coming after certain classifications of income. An S Corporation lets you separate your money between salary and capital gains, the latter of which is taxed at a lower rate.

Find a company that specializes in entity formation. It’ll cost maybe $400-500 for them to register you with the relevant state’s Secretary of State office. You don’t have to register in your home state, either. If you live in California or New York, you don’t want to—those states’ laws don’t protect you enough from creditors. Register in Delaware or Nevada or, failing that, your home state.

Once you incorporate it starts forcing you to think like a businessman. Your income will now be tabulated on IRS 1099 forms, rather than those infamous W-2s. As a practical matter, once you incorporate you’ll pay (correction: your company will pay) you a salary. What’s a reasonable amount to cover your annual living expenses— maybe $24,000? Then that’s what Employee #1, you, will receive and pay taxes on. After deductions, your effective tax rate on the salary will be close to 0.

But what about the rest of your company’s income? Legally speaking, the rest of the revenue your S Corporation takes in is not salary, but shareholder dividends. Which are taxed at a lower rate than salaries are. And you can now deduct all sorts of business expenses before calculating the net shareholder dividends you’ll pay taxes on. Go to IRS.gov and check out Form 2106. Your employer fills one of these out every time you go on a business trip, or eat a meal on company time, or buy anything related to your job. Your employer, not you, then enjoys the tax deduction.

(As for Warren Buffett’s driver, he probably makes around $80,000 a year, which would put him in the 25% bracket. Almost all of Warren Buffett’s income is in capital gains, and the highest long-term capital gains rate in the U.S. is 5 percentage points lower than the assistant’s marginal tax rate.)

*Leeches, all of you. Thanks for making the tax code so damn complicated in the first place. If not you, then your ilk.

**This post was featured in Tax Carnival #79: Filing season begins**