Carnival of Wealth, Political Overload Edition

The Hulkster wants you to say your prayers, eat your vegetables, inject your androstenedione and stop listening to all the political nonsense

 

2 political conventions in, and we’re collectively dumber. Let’s see if this week’s Carnival of Wealth doesn’t continue the trend. Again, personal finance blog posts from around the world, mostly the U.S. with a smattering of Canada. We start now:

Charles Davis at WalletHub says you need to take an inventory of your financial records, which is a capital idea. He also says you need to “consider” a safe deposit box, which is a 20th-century idea. Or a fire-safe box. A, we have these things called scanners now and 2, the next time we hear of someone saying, “I lost my house in a fire, but thank God my marriage license is still intact” will be the first. It’s almost easier to go down to the county office and request a copy than it is to buy a box and stick documents in it.

We shamed Ken Faulkenberry at AAAMP Blog back into submitting this week. Ken’s an investment planner, but hear him out. He stresses that much of managing a portfolio is not taking undue drawdowns from your clientele. That is, learn how to preserve your capital even when the market is in the toilet. Sounds easy in theory, yes. Ken explains the idea in considerably more detail.

We’re going to go with “Yes.” From Neal Frankle at Wealth Pilgrim:

you probably ask yourself, “When should I retire?” Is it simply a matter of finances? Or do you retire when you’ve “had enough” and are simple unwilling to take it anymore?

It starts with running the numbers. Well, that’s not true: it starts with knowing what numbers to run.

Thanks, I’ll just keep working until I collapse. 

That’s the spirit! Neal cites the example of a rich nonagenarian he knows who still goes into the office every day. Maybe he loves working, or maybe his wife’s just difficult to spend time with.

From PKamp3 at DQYDJ.net (Don’t Quit Your Day Job), a recommendation to…sit and wait. Those dividend stocks you were all set to load up on? Their value is largely contingent on what will happen this November. Furthermore, dividends are subject to the absurdity of double taxation – they’re taxed at the corporate level, as profits, and taxable again when distributed to shareholders.

There’s a trickle-down effect here, too. Rich people, the ones who lots of dividend stock, will rearrange their purchases to combat taxes. Smaller shareholders, like it or not, will dance to larger shareholders’ tune. And it’s in 15/9 time, with a drummer who only knows 2s and 4s.

Counterpoint: Dividend Growth Investor. He recommends that you find a basket of stocks with a 3% dividend yield (easier said than done, but whatever), and enjoy fat dividend income 24 years from now. Reinvest the dividends, and you’ll be even further ahead.

Save money by being friendly? Free Money Finance has an anecdote that illustrates how being friendly isn’t just less strain on your liver, it’s good business. It saved $50 for no incremental effort on what would have been an ordinary transaction.

Save money by not being friendly? Dave at 6400 Personal Finance reminds you that you’re not the sales clerk’s pal, you’re his mark. Dave and his girlfriend went to Maui for the weekend (you can do that when you’re stationed on O’ahu), rented a car, and chose not to buy all the useless add-ons, saving them serious cash in the process. The kind of money it took Dave a few seconds to save, it would take Iowan heartthrob Trent Hamm a year’s worth of strategic toilet flushing to pull off.

Like ours, the brain of John at Wallet Blog has been saturated beyond recognition by endless political grandstanding and rhetoric the last few weeks. As a practical matter, John would like to know what will happen to mortgage tax relief under a Romney administration or under Obama Part II. As it stands now, people who failed to make their payments weren’t taxed on any financial break their lenders cut them. You know, because responsibility sucks on wheels. Should that tax relief run its course, plenty of people who lost their houses would get a tax bill for their troubles. This is justice, but to some folks it’s unfair.

From the running-out-of-adjectives-to-describe-how-awesome-she-is Liana Arnold at CardHub, another parable about unintended consequences.

To recap: not to be confused with the mortgage slackers above, a bunch of people didn’t like their credit card balances and decided to complain about them rather than pay them. The government intervened, forcing credit card issuers to cap rates and limiting how much they could charge in swipe fees.

YOU’RE NOT GOING TO BELIEVE THIS, but the people who run the credit card companies aren’t stupid. They didn’t throw up their hands and say, “Damn. The feds foiled us at our own game. Guess we’ll just make less money now.”

No, the responsible people got punished. Banks started raising fees on everyone, and slashing benefits left and right.

Alright, that was a rant only barely related to Liana’s post. Today, she cites the prospect of merchants charging fees for customers wanting to pay with credit cards. It’d be the ultimate result of a settlement that derived from a class-action suit filed by merchants who claimed that Amex, VISA et al. overcharged them by billions of dollars.

Harry at Your PF Pro has some interesting ideas and could use an editor. Harry thinks you should diversify by country of origin. A 70-30 mutual fund balance (international and U.S., respectively) should make your holdings as stable as possible, assuming you’re locked into mutual funds. Of course, “international” covers a lot of ground, so to speak: there’s a difference between investing in Canadian companies and in Burundian ones.

One more on dividend investing and then we’re done. Dave Scott at Excess Return joins the CoW this week with his methods for evaluating and selecting dividend stocks. While we’re not sold on the importance of dividend yield to the extent that Dave is, this article is tremendously well-written, perfectly formatted, and contains a pretty chart.

Alright, one more. The comprehensive Andrew at 101 Centavos breaks down the 2 publicly traded firearm manufacturers: Sturm, Ruger and Smith & Wesson. (That’s a company called Sturm, Ruger and another called Smith & Wesson: not a company called Sturm and another called Ruger and Smith & Wesson. Companies with commas in their names are reprehensible.) Andrew’s post gives credence to our observation that the better and more thought-provoking a post is, the fewer comments it inspires. Andrew is a Ruger shareholder (unlike us, mere Ruger customers) and illustrates the stark difference between the companies’ management styles. Also, for you ladies looking to be stereotyped, a mention of how “pink guns are becoming more commonplace.”

We kind of miss the bad submissions. This week’s were impossible to make fun of. Well, there’s always next week.

Wait. One more. Serial submitter and avowed masochist Lance at Money, Life & More maxed out his Roth IRA.

Oh, did we mention we’re on Investopedia? Yahoo! Finance, too, once in a while. New blog posts here every Wednesday and Friday, new CoW every Monday. Anti-Tips every day. See you tomorrow.

 

 

Carnival of Wealth, Management Day Edition

 

Navigating your organization to new heights while inspiring business performance!

Today is Labor Day. And today’s Carnival of Wealth is dedicated to the millions of hardworking executives who tell labor what to do. Managers, loosen your ties and enjoy a few hours away from the office. You earned it.

The Carnival of Wealth. Scores, then dozens, now singles of posts about personal finance. From the sublime to the passable. From around the world. Starting now:

The CoW welcomes Harry Campbell at Your PF Pro, who shares our method for figuring out what credit card(s) to get. He writes about reward points, cash back offers and other features, without saying Word 1 about interest. Why? Because, as we’ve pointed out time and again, every card charges an interest rate of 0 if you pay your balance on time. Harry’s advice is basic and straightforward, and some people will still overthink it and refuse to look at anything other than “LOW INTRODUCTORY APR” before willingly signing up to have the credit card issuers take advantage of them. Those people will never be self-determining, let alone rich.

The redoubtable Liana Arnold of CardHub returns with a post about the relentless mission creep of government agencies. Well, that’s not what she intended it as, but that’s how we’re interpreting it.

Last year, thanks to all you idiots who can’t pay your credit card balances on time (see above) and who failed to read the agreements that you signed when you got the cards, the federal government created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Somewhere to complain, and somewhere to fix prices. Today, the CFPB has added the oversight of credit reporting bureaux to its purview. Your tax dollars at idleness. (Alas, Liana cites “Bad Boys” as a Bob Marley song. It was Inner Circle. In Liana’s defense, reggae artists are not hard to confuse.)

From John Kiernan at Wallet Blog, a post that speculates on the challenges that might face the next chairman of the Federal Reserve. No, current chairman Ben Bernanke has not been drawn & quartered (yet), but John thinks that Bernanke might not serve past 2014. As Bernanke’s nemesis and erstwhile presidential hopeful Ron Paul passes from the spotlight this week, we’ll take up the torch and the battle cry – “End the Fed”, the institution that’s gotten in the way of economic recovery throughout its loathsome century-long history.

Recent guest poster W at Off-Road Finance tells us a gambling story. No, not about the fat jackpot he won, but about the money he left on the table. W actually relied on his brain, rather than his gut, but still didn’t capitalize on a golden opportunity. His point? You need to do more than think, however rationally, to make money. You have to employ a little risk, too. The final paragraph of his post is one of the best we’ve ever read on the art of making money.

Free Money Finance begins a series on how to make extra money. Unlike some less rigorous bloggers we could mention, he doesn’t suggest selling your extra stuff or unscrewing the bulb from your oven light. Instead, he recommends that you do what you know; specifically that you teach what you’re proficient at, whether in a classroom setting or informally. If you don’t mind being around children (some of us are masochists), knock yourself out.

Joe Plemon of Personal Finance By The Book, who’s apparently a lot older than he looks, tells the story of his daughter who recently had her home insurance policy cancelled.  She made 3 claims in 9 years, got dropped, and signed with someone else for twice as much. Joe doesn’t tell us what the claims were, but does give a few ideas on how to avoid getting in that situation in the first place. The story has a happy ending in that she didn’t have to move back home and sleep in Joe’s garage.

Jill at My Dollar Plan writes about the ultimate fate of the Bush tax cuts, set to expire in 2010 and then given multiple respites. The House wants to extend them for everyone, the Senate wants to restrict them to people under a certain income. This is the same Senate that’s gone 3+ years without creating a budget, so no hurry. Maybe, just maybe, businesses would be more eager to hire people and invest if they could estimate their 2013 tax bills. The Control Your Cash Obvious Tax Plan (standard personal income deduction for everyone, uniform rate on the rest, zero corporate taxes) still doesn’t have any adherents in Congress. They know better.

Dividend Growth Investor tells us his secret, not much of a secret. He invests in blue chips that pay consistent dividends, year after year. (You mean throwing all your money at an unproven company like Facebook isn’t the way to build lasting wealth?) He has a quantifiable if not numerical investment goal – have his dividend income exceed his expenses – and he’s well on his way. This week he explains his criteria for investments. He doesn’t merely invest in any blue chip that bats his eyes at him, but rather at ones that have large moats, customer loyalty, competitive advantages…well, read the post. We don’t want to ruin it.

Mich at Beating the Index knows the Canadian resource markets better than anyone, or at least better than anyone who contributes to the CoW. This week he breaks down Marquee Energy – a Calgary-based oil driller with operations in Alberta and Saskatchewan. Ray Kroc once said his company is in the real estate business; Marquee might be too, for reasons you’ll discover when you click the link.

Finally, unregistered sex offender Nelson at Financial Uproar took time out from his prurient post series about hot finance babes to write about investing in yourself. That means doing something other than motivating yourself. Motivating yourself is the easy part. Nelson has noticed, as have we, that as a rule the people who read the most self-help books accomplish the least. Kind of like how the people who have the most home gym equipment serving double duty as clothes racks are the fattest.

Self-help books are perfect for letting you feel like you’ve accomplished something when you’ve really just read a book.

A rousing chorus of dittos for that, and we’re done.

UPDATE:

A late addition from Lance at Money, Life & More, which slipped just under our clearly stated deadline. Actually it didn’t, it was late, but Lance insisted. This is the much-anticipated sequel to the post of a fortnight ago (Lance was on vacation last week), “How To Write A Check”. Remember that? Why he performed the intermediate step of submitting it to us instead of just forwarding it directly to the Pulitzer Committee, we’re not sure.

This week, Lance suggests that you Save Half Of Every Raise For Retirement! (exclamation point his.) Our conclusion? Some post is walking around with nothing, because this one has it all! (exclamation point ours):

1. Advice given that the writer would never heed himself, phrased as something he’ll do (i.e., won’t do) in the future

I Plan to Save Half of Every Raise for Retirement

2. Homonym confusion

The best part of combating lifestyle inflation is that you’re overall expenses are lower.

3. Facile observation posing as insight

If I save more money now I will have more money at my disposal when I retire.

4. Guest sentence by Emmitt Smith

When it comes to retirement you only need to replaces your expenses

557 words that the author defecated out in less time than it would to defecate something more literal. Oh wait, one more:

5. The obligatory italicized postscript questions, written to inspire comments

So would you consider saving half of every raise for retirement? Which effect do you like better, saving more for retirement or combating lifestyle inflation?

If this post were any more derivative, Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz would be taking credit for discovering it. The record for consecutive joke posts submitted to the CoW remains 6 by the chick from Newlyweds on a Budget, the Cal Ripken of blog carnivals. Because Lance missed last week, his streak starts again at 1.

Okay, now we’re done. Check us out on Investopedia, again and again. ProBlogger, too. See you back here tomorrow with new stuff, too. ‘Til then.

Carnival of Wealth, Solid Gold Edition

Whiter and shinier than we remember

 

This week, no garbage. Yes, the awful posts are fun to mock, but it’s the kind of satisfaction that can leave you wanting if you partake in too much of it. Like that second bite of funnel cake at the county fair. We haven’t reached the point of diminishing returns yet, but for the sake of variety today’s carnival will consist of nothing but well-crafted posts.

If you’re new here, the Carnival of Wealth is our weekly roundup of personal finance blog posts from other sites. And as you can surmise, most of the submissions we receive serve only as bad examples. But not today, God willing. Let’s get started:

Andrew runs a site, 101 Centavos, that’s almost as entertaining as this one is. Andrew shows us where a flaw can lie in the Dogs of the Dow strategy. He also tells us that he used to be a project manager for, of all companies, Avon, in, of all places, Saudi Arabia. Avon is the focus of this post. Apparently there are some investors who think after online commerce has supplanted much of its brick-and-mortar predecessors, there’s still room for direct sales of cosmetics. Best of luck with that.

Ladies, if you’re too unattractive to marry someone rich, you’re going to need to save for retirement. Monette at Finance Guide Tips lays out all the important basics in one post – how much a typical 401(k) match is, what a summary plan description is, where to find the perfect pleated skirt, etc.

Entrepreneurship. Oh, you mean it wasn’t a rhetorical question? It’s our response to the title of Ted Jenkin’s post at Your Smart Money Moves: College Education or Entrepreneurship? Ted tells the stories of two adolescents who chased their dreams immediately instead of deferring life first. (Yes, it was the white kid who sold furniture and the Indian kid who ran a web hosting business. Racial stereotypes exist for a reason.)

Still sold on going to college, huh? If you’re not going to study the hard sciences (political science, despite its name, is anything but a hard science), math, the applied sciences, or the financial sciences, you’re wasting your time. And probably wasting taxpayer dollars too, not that that’s anything anyone cares about anymore. Free Money Finance reminds you to begin with the end in mind – figure out where you want to be 4 years from now, then tailor your college and major toward that. This is another one of those posts where it was hard to select just one excerpt to illustrate its brilliance, but here goes:

A relative told me her son was headed to college next year and asked if I had any thoughts on how he should decide where to go. My answer was something like “pick a college that has a good record of getting graduates good jobs in the student’s chosen field.” Her response was, “Wow, that’s a great idea. I never really thought of that.”

Speaking of college students getting in over their heads, Mike at Rewards Cards Canada lists a bunch of credit cards for aspiring debtors. There’s a table and everything. Here it is, reprinted with his implicit permission:

Take a big black Sharpie, and immediately cross out the entire 2nd column. Seriously, go ahead and do it, right now. Deface your computer screen, we don’t care.  One more time: interest rates don’t matter. They are the least important criterion when selecting a card.

Why? Because every card carries the exact same interest rate: 0. (You are paying the entire balance off every month, right? Otherwise, why are you in possession of a card? You’ve proven you can’t handle credit.)

Now cross out the entire 5th row, too. Because paying a company $19 when someone else offers a virtually indistinguishable product for nothing is stupid.

That leaves one informative column, the 3rd one. And one obvious choice for which card to get. God, personal finance is the easiest subject in the world. There’s no excuse for not being rich, or at least liquid.

Possibly. That’s the answer to another question posed in a blog post’s title: Is it Time to Refinance Your Mortgage?, courtesy of Charles Davis at Wallet Hub. Most people fail to take closing costs into account when refinancing, a necessary expenditure that lenders don’t like to publicize. But still, 15-year rates are at 3.04% right now. Your grandchildren might one day pay 18% and ask you to tell them stories about how awesome life was in the ’10s.

That’s Wallet Hub, not to be confused with the slightly different Wallet Blog. John Kiernan avails us of a infernal little number called the mortgage credit score, not to be confused with its more generic brethren. Who knew that paying your credit card bills on time while being consistently late with your rent might be a bad thing?

The chick at Young & Thrifty figured out that if an airline does a promotion, reading the fine print can be worth your while. She earned points for buying as little as $3 worth of gas at a time, so guess what? Yeah, she turned every fuel-up into multiple transactions. And saved an effective $80 an hour in the process. Not quite as awesome as The Pudding Guy, but still very impressive. Bonus: She spelled “paraphernalia” correctly, which no one ever does. Double bonus: She casually mentioned her boyfriend in the final paragraph, slicing the ribbon of hope from all her single male readers in one swift motion.

You know what your parents are going to leave you? Nothing. Boomer and Echo remind you to rely on yourself for your retirement, rather than on the miserly instincts of the previous generation. (Note: Boomer & Echo submit almost every week, and it’s usually Echo who writes the posts. This week it was Boomer. Boomer happens to be Echo’s mother, making this the single greatest passive-aggressive post in the history of the CoW. We can’t wait for next week’s submission from Echo, “Hospice Care In The Next Decade: Will Seniors Really Be Admitted Against Their Will?”)

Finally, in at least 2 senses, Part VI in W’s series on A Speculative Alternative to Investing at Off-Road Finance. You need to read the 5 previous installments to make sense of it, but that would be time well worth your while. This post is technical, but not at all unintelligible. W takes sophisticated concepts and illustrates them for the committed layperson who wants to be rich. Hopefully, that’s you.

Thanks again. New Anti-Tip of the Day tomorrow, new posts Wednesday and Friday, new CoW Monday. New Investopedia posts intermittently. See ya.