It’s Time To Get Unbalanced

Also, the circus pays next to nothing

 

NOTE: A big, sloppy welcome to all The Simple Dollar readers who discovered us this week. Unlike that site, where the comments are the only parts worth reading, here it’s the exact opposite. (Primarily because we don’t run comments. If you want to say something compelling or critical, try us here. Check out the archives, too. Reams of actionable, non-obvious advice and analysis for the upwardly aspiring. Enjoy.) 

Can you handle another food/investing analogy? Well, you’re getting one.

The standard recommendation is to invest 60% of your portfolio in stocks and 40% in bonds. Or (110 – your age)% in stocks and (your age – 10)% in bonds. Or 57% in stocks and 53% in bonds (awesome if you can do it). All of the above are useless, pointless and unhelpful.

It’s like saying 40% of your daily caloric intake should be carbohydrates, 30% protein and 30% fat.

Okay, then let’s eat a diet consisting of 40% Gummi bears, 30% bearded seal meat and 30% lard. DONE!

You can’t look at classifications. They tell you nothing. You have to look at individual cases. Otherwise, you’d be forced to believe that:

-All pit bulls are dangerous
-All Jews are stingy
-All blacks enjoy grape soda
-All Armenians beat their wives
-All Canadians are sensitive.

Alright, that last one is demonstrably true.

Yes, we get the conventional wisdom. You’re supposed to be invested in equities when you’re young, i.e. when you can withstand greater variation in your investments. If you’re 22 and you get wiped out because you loaded up on Electronic Arts stock, the thinking goes that it’s not the end of the world because you have decades left in which to earn money. And if you bought lots of Recon Technology (a penny stock that’s up 4- or 5-fold this year, and will probably come crashing down to Earth soon enough), well, that’ll increase your options and require you to work incrementally less hard for a living in the long road ahead of you.

And when you’re old, you need to limit your downside – and by extension, your upside. No fancy swings for me, young man. Instead I’ll load up on debentures and other low-risk investments. I just want to come as close to a fixed income as I can. Now let me watch 60 Minutes in peace, and turn that damn music down.

No one should invest in asset classes. But people hear advice that’s easy to swallow, or at least easy to remember, and they say to the person in charge of their 401(k), “Put me in that one fund, with the 60-40 stock-bond split.” BOOM! Investing now completed! That was easy!

When you passively manage your investments – that is, when you get someone else to do it – you’re letting that person dictate your potential return. More accurately, you’re letting that person’s biases and instincts dictate your return. Here’s what we mean:

Your company’s comptroller has one overriding professional objective, and it has nothing to do with making sure you have a comfortable retirement. Rather, it’s far more mundane. Like most people on this planet, all he wants is to keep his job. Same goes for the fund manager’s representative who shows up at your workplace on open enrollment day. She could give a damn whether you sign up for the aggressive no-load fund or the generic income fund. She just wants you to sign up for something, and wants you to not lose so much money that it’ll jeopardize her position.

Further up the chain, the fund manager is playing it conservatively, too. Invest in too few blue chips, and you’re running the risk of higher returns. Which means you’re running the risk of lower returns, which if they come to fruition could lead to angry investors. Enough angry investors means the fund manager gets fired and has to do something else for a living, maybe even work retail in a building with fewer than 80 floors. Most fund managers would rather die, so they continue playing it safe, creating largely indistinguishable mutual funds that each do not-too-horribly. And everyone’s happy. The fund manager doesn’t have to worry about returns that are far from average, the Morgan Stanley or Ameriprise advisor doesn’t have to worry about losing your company’s business, the aforementioned comptroller thus keeps your company’s owner satisfied, and your future is now invested in a hideously complex 401(k) that includes minute amounts of hundreds of large companies, almost all of which will stay stable enough on balance to keep your investment from vanishing.

But you can do so much more. It doesn’t matter how old you are, what your sensitivity to risk is, or whether Dave Ramsey thinks your portfolio incurs a suitable split between stocks and bonds; underpriced securities (really, underpriced investments of any kind) are always there, and always available to whomever’s in the mood for mostly free money.

Buy individual stocks, not just mutual funds. Stocks with powerful fundamentals are always worth buying. And if you’re unclear, by “powerful fundamentals” we mean regular profits, little debt (or at least, debt that the company’s profitable operations can afford to cover), possible treasury stock, and a high ratio of assets to liabilities. If any of those terms sound unfamiliar, buy our book.

God’s greatest gift to the amateur investor is stocks whose prices have temporarily fallen for irrational reasons, yet whose underlying businesses still have those powerful fundamentals. When public pressure is on the stock of a healthy company like British Petroleum to fall (as it was a couple of years ago), or on Netflix to fall (as it was last autumn), that’s a buy sign if ever there was one. It’s the exact opposite of the recent love-in between dilettante investors and Facebook, a company awash in publicity but with no publicly verifiable financial data to speak of. Quite the opposite, in fact.

Unballyhooed is good. Temporarily beleaguered is good (accent on “temporarily”). But nothing substitutes for a strong set of financial statements. A mere $3 can get you on your way to learning how to add a little self-determination to your investing. And give you a chance to make far, far more than if you’re merely letting someone else pick out a mutual fund for you.

The Control Your Cash Mailbag, Part II of II

You missed Wednesday’s Part I? Here it is.

Continuing where we left off, here are more questions from confused CYC readers. Get your questions in to info at Control Your Cash dot com.

Free to make. Expensive to keep up.

 

Dear CYC:

I’m 31, my husband’s 33, and we’ve decided that we’d finally like to start a family. However, wouldn’t you know it, he just got laid off from his $42,000-a-year job. I don’t really have a question, just a couple of statements. Thanks. Love your blog!

Sincerely,
Katii in Des Moines

Dear Katii:

You do understand that children cost money, right? Regardless of the countless non-monetary benefits they bring to your life (sleepless nights, filthy undergarments, permanent supervision, constant screaming for attention, the potential for physical catastrophe at every turn), they come with a financial obligation that’s impossible to ignore or cut corners on.

So yes, get pregnant as soon as possible. Maybe you’ll be blessed with twins. As for secondary concerns like your cash flow having dwindled to zero, you can worry about those later. Besides, there are always credit cards: most people don’t come anywhere near their spending limits. That’s thousands of untapped dollars, right at your disposal. Knock yourself out.

Dear CYC:

I started at my job 3 years ago (district representative, golf and tennis equipment sales) and have yet to see a promotion. My figures are consistently in the top 40% of the company. I thought I’d be a regional manager by now, but I’m still waiting. It’s almost like they’re daring me to look elsewhere, where my talents will be more appreciated. In August I asked my boss about a promotion and/or pay increase. He hasn’t gotten back to me. Should I leave him another message, or should I try the HR manager instead?

Sincerely,
“The Chadder” in El Cajon

Dear The Chadder:

You mean your boss didn’t rush to you to say “What we can do to keep you happy, and keep you here?”? If he needed something from you – a sales report, receipts from your last business trip, a status update on your new intern – he’d ask for it instead of waiting for you to volunteer it. That he’s not doing the same thing with your salary increase request should tell you something. Maybe you can’t figure out that by “something”, we mean “he doesn’t want to give you more money.”

And why should he? You think you deserve it, but what leverage do you have? Your boss can either pay you what he’s paying you now, or pay you more, but either way he still has you as an employee. So he has no incentive to choose the latter.

Your choices are not only greater than you think, but different than you think. Forget about memorizing his lunch schedule so you can catch him in the hallway for a salary discussion. You’re going to have to do one of the following:

Line up another job and threaten to walk (this is the least good idea, because it’ll put you in the same position, just with a different company.)
Venture out on your own. Spend $500 registering with your state governing body and incorporate. But as what? A sports equipment wholesaler? Something completely unrelated to your current gig? We don’t know all the details of your situation, but right now you’re at the mercy of someone whose job description includes trying to pay you as little as possible. You need to be at the mercy of yourself.
All that money you spend on liabilities, rather than assets, is keeping your options limited. There are people who spend hundreds of dollars a month on alcohol and other entertainment expenses. A little discipline exacted over a short period can turn that money from a negative into a positive. Instead of going out with the fellas or buying a gaming system, earmark your spare cash for a down payment on some real estate, a residence, or maybe part of a commercial building. Find a realtor to find you a renter. Get the latter to indirectly make your mortgage payments. Invest the surplus if any, and take the tax deduction. You just need to think beyond putters and ball retrievers.

Sorry, we just don’t have the stomach for a Part III. Next month.

This article is featured in the following carnivals:

**The Carnival of Financial Camaraderie #8**

**The Festival of Frugality**

The Control Your Cash Mailbag, Part I of II

Got a question? Submit it to info at Control Your Cash dot com. Today we discuss college education and weddings, two of our favorite topics. Our long-winded answers follow, with more mailbag goodness on Friday.

This pigeon has more financial sense than some of our readers

 

Dear CYC:

I’m a junior at a fairly prestigious (non-Ivy League) school in the northeast. I’m doing a double major in English and philosophy, and maintaining a 2.5 average. My student loan balance currently stands at $29,708.48.

Even though I still have another year to go, the problem is that all the job fairs around campus specify “engineering majors preferred” or “mathematics and business students only need apply” or some such thing. I’m beginning to wonder if there’s going to be a job for me once I graduate. I know that the average college graduate makes $1 million more over the course of his career than someone who never went to college, so I’m not worried. But a little advice would be nice.

Sincerely,
Trenton in Ithaca

Dear Trenton:



Thanks for writing. You’re an imbecile. A college-educated one, but still. That old and misleading axiom about going to college being worth $1 million is an example of paying attention to the mean while ignoring the standard deviation, two relatively simple statistical concepts that they were teaching in the adjacent building while you were busy trying to make sense of William Faulkner. The students who earn marketable degrees each average well over $1 million more in earnings than their counterparts who never attended college. In fact, those students will make so much money that they’ll lift the average up, even though you and your fellow English and philosophy majors are dragging it down.

The hard sciences will always be in demand. There’s a reason they’re called “hard”, by the way. To learn chemistry or zoology, you can’t simply wait until the night before a paper’s due, spew 3000 words on the page, and hope that proper grammar and spelling will at least get you a C. Go into any Starbucks (or Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, or Seattle’s Best) and you’ll be greeted by college-educated employees who are thin, sallow, well-spoken and impoverished. Most of them are loath to admit the stark reality that they wasted (at least) 4 years of their lives and will never recoup the costs of their education.

Drop out now. Go to a local trade school and study to become an electrician or an HVAC tech. It’ll cost next to nothing compared to what you’ve wasted so far. You’re not going to listen to that, but if you run the numbers you’ll realize that you can still salvage your life and build some positive net worth before it’s too late.

 

Dear CYC:

My boyfriend finally proposed!!!!! I’m so excited!!!!! Sorry I know you hate excalamation points but I couldn’t help myself. Anyhow, we’re planning the wedding for next summer. I found the PERFECT dress and the PERFECT bridesmaid dresses. We’ve decided we’re going to hold the ceremony on Santa Catalina Island and maybe turn it into an all-week affair, invite all our friends and family. I hired a wedding planner (can’t start these things too soon!) and she estimates that it’s going to cost us around $50,000-$55,000. I don’t want to cut corners on what’s going to be the most important day of my life, but my fiance is already a little apprehensive about it. My parents have said they’d help out, and quite frankly I don’t see why “spare no expense” should be a bad philosophy to have for just one day. What do you think?

Sincerely,
Kim in Laguna Beach

Dear Kim:

According to our estimates, 98% of indebted couples started off with ostentatious weddings. Look, the Duchess of Cambridge gets an obscenely expensive wedding. You don’t. You should have married a prince instead of a assistant quality control supervisor, but what’s done is done.

As for what’s not done, there are few financial decisions as dumb as that to spend money on a wedding ceremony. You’re getting married, so presumably you’re an adult now (unless you’re one of those Mohammedan child brides.) That means that you should have advanced past the immature belief that instant gratification is the most important thing in the world. For the opportunity to spend a few hours stroking your ego and being the center of attention among your friends and family, you’re committing to spending months if not years paying for the privilege.

Yes, your wedding planner is a friend of a friend and she’s just trying to make a living. Yes, you’ll look radiant in white taffeta (and more importantly, everyone will know it.) Yes, your bridesmaids will look hideous in that chartreuse ensemble that accentuates their belly fat, all the better to make you seem even more glamorous by comparison. Now let’s look at the other side of the equation:

That $50,000 estimate will get you a down payment on a quarter-million dollar residence. Granted, in Laguna Beach that probably means a condo the size of a matchbook cover, but this isn’t China: you can move wherever you want (except for Mercury, Nevada.)

If you spend the money on the wedding instead, you’ll have to rent, giving all of your residential expenses to someone else and receiving nothing of lasting value in return. Or you’ll have to borrow even more to buy a comparable place to live, which will be exceedingly difficult seeing as mortgage lenders aren’t in the habit of giving 100% loans to people anymore (and haven’t been for a few years now.) When you’re living in a squalid apartment a year after you’ve gotten married, seething with envy at your friends who bought houses and are building wealth right out of the gate, and wondering if you should extend your lease, you can look at the photo album of your wedding day and those memories will make it all better. Assuming you’re in the lucky half of couples who don’t divorce.

Part II Friday.

**This article is featured in the Yakezie Carnival November Edition**