GUEST POST: Don’t Reach For The Middle

We found someone who wasn’t intimidated by our guest post guidelines. Nelson Smith, who blogs over at Financial Uproar. He’s one of the very few personal finance bloggers who can actually write. And he’s hilarious. And we agree with almost all of what he has to say. If you like this post, then he’d love for you to come check out his blog.

Few people notice how roomy it is on the right side of the curve.

I’m friends with a married couple, even though I’m single. Yeah, it’s a little weird.

This married couple is just like so many others. They’re both gainfully employed, combined they probably make close to $90k per year. They have reasonable housing costs and reasonable vehicle costs too, since they’re both smart enough to drive fully-paid-for used cars. They don’t spend excessive money on wants. They probably go out a little more than they should, but that’s fairly common for young people. Hell, I go out more often than I should, and I’m probably the third cheapest bastard on the whole internet.

On the surface, they don’t seem to be in bad financial shape. There’s no obvious place where they overspend. Yet, like so many others, they struggle to make ends meet every month. Are they morons? Well… yes. But they’ve got numbers on their side.

If this couple complains to me about their finances one more time, I’ll strangle their puppy. They easily make enough to pay for bills and to save for a rainy day. This shouldn’t be that hard. Why are they struggling so much? Here’s a snapshot of some of the excess in their lives:

– an alarm system ($40 per month)
– unlimited long distance ($20 per month)
– movie rental subscriptions ($25 per month)
– overdraft charges ($40 per month)
– new shoes from some website ($40 per month)
– a dog (>$50 per month)

Chances are, you’re practically blinded with outrage right now. What morons! Who gets a perpetual liability (that’s the dog) when they can barely afford to make ends meet? Who needs new shoes every month? They literally go to work and leave the house unlocked, yet pay for an alarm system. There’s hundreds of dollars more that they could cut from their budget tomorrow if they were serious about cutting. It doesn’t take a financial genius to figure out they’re wasting money. Why don’t they just do it?

Because they don’t care.

Most people sit in kind of a financial purgatory. They don’t get themselves in too much trouble, yet they never bother to get ahead. Every month they essentially break even. Because they have no financial sense, they pat themselves on the back for not getting any further in the hole. They slowly make progress on their student loans or credit cards, even eventually paying them off. Once they do, they decide they can now afford another payment, so they buy a new car. They rinse and repeat until sweet, sweet death saves them from their never-ending avalanche of payments.

Okay, not really. But they don’t get wealthy, that’s for sure.

As the writers here at Control Your Cash advocate tirelessly, the key to wealth is quite simple. Buy assets. Sell liabilities. Keep doing these things until you become wealthy. I guarantee if my friends read that golden rule, they’d understand it. Yet they have just about zero hope of ever implementing it. They’re just not PFers.

For those of you unfamiliar with the term, a PFer is a personal finance geek. PFers check their bank balances more than once a week. PFers constantly look for ways to trim the excess from their budgets. PFers spend more time on their budgets than their sex lives. PFers… well, you get the idea.

Most of the people who’ll ever regularly read this blog are PFers. Some just stumbled here looking for really snarky posts on the lottery or something. Most of us are people trying to move in one direction- toward wealth. And since we hang around each other so much, we often forget just how different we are than most other people.

What I’m going to propose just might shock and appall you, but that’s kind of what I do. After all, my blog is called Financial Uproar. It isn’t called Sunshine Flowers Puppy Personal Finance Hug Hour. I try to tell it like it is, just like the fine folks here at Control Your Cash. And that’s why we’ll be friends forever. Well, that and our friendship bracelets. You did get my friendship bracelet, right Greg? (Ed. note: No.)

What was I talking about again? Right. Here’s what you should do about your friends’ bad financial habits – absolutely nothing. You should give no advice. You should avoid bringing up money topics. They’ll complain about how their financial life sucks, but you should offer no advice past the most simple of concepts. Do not get involved in their finances one bit. And for the love of God, never lend them a dime.

No matter what the accomplishment, the impetus for change has to come from within. If your friends are going to improve their finances, they have to do it. No amount of prodding or helping on your part will get them to change. They have to get to whatever their breaking point is. Your help won’t do squat, as much as you think it might.

Most people will never reach that point. They’ll have a mortgage payment for most of their adult lives. They’ll cash out equity from their house to take vacations and buy cars and pay for their kids’ weddings, because they’re morons. They’ll think they’re doing well because they’ll compare themselves to the masses instead of comparing themselves to the wealthy. 

Chances are that if they’re not already on the path of wealth, they’ll never become any higher than middle-class. No matter how much you want to help, it’ll ultimately fall on deaf ears. You can’t help somebody who doesn’t want to help themselves. Or, more accurately, you can’t help someone who doesn’t think they have a problem.

**This article is featured in the Yakezie Carnival -Newbie Edition**


**This article is featured in the Totally Money Carnival #32-A Flood of Great Articles**

 

Stealing Money With Lease Options

If you missed Part 1, check it out now (funk soul brother)

This is what happens on the 365th day of most lease-option agreements. Either that, or someone reups.

Don’t confuse a lease option with its sturdier sibling, a lease purchase, in which you’re obligated to sell the house and the tenant is obligated to buy (unless you mutually agree not to.) Because clearly you should avoid this, we’re not going to explain why you shouldn’t. You shouldn’t smoke cigarettes either, but if you don’t know why we’re not going to waste time telling you.

Again, it’s called a lease option. You want the tenant to be in a position where she can choose to buy the house. If she’s required to buy the house, that means you’re required to sell it. You want to hold on to your asset if at all possible.

We’ve left one crucial piece of information out so far. How many tenants exercise their lease options and live happily ever after?

Some estimates range as low as 5%, which common sense should dictate is a reasonable figure. Again, to exercise the option the tenant has to be able to diligently save for 12 months (or however long the lease is.) Leopards don’t change their spots. Why wasn’t the tenant able to have saved that money in the first place? The vast majority of lease-option tenants simply don’t have the self-control to build up a down payment. What they do have are dreams built on gossamers.

Would you buy a lottery ticket with a 95% chance of winning? For a smart landlord, that’s what a lease-option is. The downside here is minuscule. Not negligible, but tiny. Remember, the worst-case scenario is that you got a year’s worth of free money. For that worst case to happen, the appraised value of your house has to have risen enough that it’s worth the tenant’s while to make an offer. Plus the tenant has to be good for the money. Future housing prices and your tenant’s ability to save are two variables out of your control, but the odds are still hugely in your favor.

One advantage to lease-options is that they work in both expensive and cheap housing markets. In the former case, tenants are looking to lock in a price for fear that eventually they won’t be able to ever buy anything. In the latter case, when the likelihood of the tenant exercising the option is greater (yet still small), you the landlord protect yourself against any potential losses. While still charging premium rents.

(Obligatory paragraph about the morality of this, and seriously, we’re not going to address this again. The tenants know what they’re getting into. They have to sign the lease-option agreement, which means they’re obligated to read it or get someone to explain it to them.)

Really, the only downside is the 5% chance that you could “lose” (i.e. have to sell) your house. Even if that’s a conservative estimate, it’s still overwhelmingly likely that once your lease-option term expires, you’ll still have a house and your tenant will have nothing. That house remains an asset, and not just in that it’s got a dollar value attached to it. At Control Your Cash, we define an asset as something that’ll help you grow wealth (You really need to read the book.)

The house doesn’t just have an intrinsic worth, it enables you to increase your own worth by letting you rent it out – over and over again.

One more thing. Make sure your lease-option agreement prohibits the tenant from coming to the end of the term, not having the money to purchase the house in hand, and thus simply assigning the option to someone else whom she can then buy the house from at her convenience. This is called a “non-assignability” clause. You don’t want the tenant’s rich uncle covering for her and taking your asset.

Rent-to-own is how certain enterprising furniture and appliance sellers got obscenely rich. If there are enough people out there who can’t even muster up the requisite money to buy a sofa without making a year’s worth of payments, imagine how many more can’t do the same thing for a house.

**This article is featured in the Carnival of Personal Finance #319-Summer Heat Wave Edition**

 

“Your health is the most important thing.” Uh-huh.

Every d-bag in this picture (the "d" stands for "dirt") thinks he or she is rich.

A few weeks ago, the popular personal finance meta-blog Yakezie held a contest for students, asking them to define richness and answer related questions. Even though our studyin’ days are long in the past, we decided to write an essay anyway and modify it for you folks. If this doesn’t spur some comments, nothing G-rated will.

Do you think becoming rich is easy or hard in America?  Please explain your viewpoint.  
What is rich to you?  Is it a dollar amount in the bank, a lifestyle, or perhaps even a state of mind?  
The United States is the richest country in the world.  Will there always be poverty?

In the fashion of a corporate customer service department, let’s answer these questions in the order in which they were received.

Becoming rich in America is easy – maybe not easy in absolute terms, but the qualifier “in America” implies that we’re to compare getting rich here relative to getting rich elsewhere.

In the vast majority of the world, getting “rich” means capitalizing on influence and heredity. The most motivated, diligent, dedicated Kyrgyz camel tender or Mozambican copper miner can’t get rich in any meaningful way that we in the Western world understand the term. The opportunities for entrepreneurship just don’t exist elsewhere, for the most part.  The opportunities for joining the governmental apparatus and perpetuating it abound, however. (But only if you’re connected.) And while the United States still has its share of nepotism, red tape, political maneuvering and corruption, it’s nothing compared to what goes on in the rest of the world.

Your humble blogger has a slightly different perspective, having been born and raised elsewhere and only arriving in the United States at the age of 25. When I did I had no money, nor did I have any connections – unless you count the hotel waiter I’d met in Miami a couple years earlier who let me crash on his couch when I first emigrated*. My dreams were modest, but they were distinctively American: make enough to achieve financial independence, ideally on my own and without having a boss breathing down my neck.

So what is rich to us? You’re not going to hear us give some bromide about it being health and good friends, or any of that crap. This isn’t a box of Kashi cereal. If non-monetary criteria are what make people rich, then everyone’s rich, and therefore no one’s rich because “richness” loses its meaning.

“Rich” as we define it means not having to worry about worrying about money. It means having assets that routinely outpace liabilities. Beyond a certain level of subsistence, that’s all anyone can hope for. If you gross $100,000 a year, spend money on everything you could possibly want and need and have $20,000 remaining at the end of the year, and can apply that to the following year’s assets, you’re rich. If you make $5 million and have a $6 million hooker-and-heroin habit, you’re poor.

Will there always be poverty? Again, it makes all the difference in the world whether we’re talking in absolute or relative terms. Our poorest acquaintance lives far more lavishly than John D. Rockefeller ever dreamed of. She can communicate across the world instantaneously. She can control the temperature of her dwelling with the press of a button. She can travel at speeds that the richest people of previous generations couldn’t fathom. For pennies a day, she can ensure that her teeth will stay strong and not fall out of her head. She can eat thousands of calories daily without having to spend time doing the backbreaking labor of growing the food herself. Or even cooking that much of it.

So yes, there will always be “poverty” in the sense that someone will be at the bottom – even though that bottom has risen throughout the history of civilization and will continue to. Is that a bad thing? Not if the alternative to having some at the bottom is to have everyone at the bottom. It’s important to remember that everything is transitory. The vast majority of people in the lowest quintile of income don’t stay there long: it’s more a function of the point a “poor” person’s at in his or her life – just out of school for instance, or unmarried and pregnant with one’s sixth baby – rather than a permanent condition of status. Both Control Your Cash principals were poor by any modern definition at 19. And are probably rich by most people’s definition a couple of decades later. We wouldn’t have changed any of it to have lived under circumstances where the opportunity to fail and be poor wasn’t available.

*No, it wasn’t the follow-up to a torrid homosexual tryst. Just because a guy sets foot in Miami doesn’t mean he’s gay. You people are perverts.

**This article is featured in the Yakezie Carnival-Best of Yazekie this Week**

**This article is also featured in the Baby Boomers Blog Carnival One Hundred-second Edition**