Dartboard investing only works when you stand inches away

Dartboard Investing

Those ancient Mayans had one messed-up clock

 

Every day, people miss out on great investments because they don’t know how to quantify risk vs. return. You need written investment criteria.  Here’s a sample.

If you don’t have the energy to click the link, it’s mostly a series of questions that read something like this:

What type of investment is it?
Real estate.

This is a straightforward question with a clear answer. Knowing what classification the investment falls into tells you how liquid it is and how much its value might fluctuate. If the investment were a stock it’d be easy to sell, though not necessarily for a premium. A plot of dirt, improved or raw, has tangible value. But selling it, even in a seller’s market, can burn a lot of hours.

If I bite, how will this affect my allocation?
Negligible.

You don’t necessarily want your eggs in a million baskets, nor in one, but you do need to know how many they’re in. And if the breakdown among the baskets gets out of proportion, you want to know that, too. Say your portfolio starts out with 33% in growth stocks, 33% in long-term notes and 33% in real estate. Six months later, if the percentages have changed to 5, 34 and 61, you’ll want to rearrange to keep things in balance (or ride the 61% component if so inclined.)

But what if this transaction did affect allocation? What would you do to balance the imbalance? You could sell an asset, buy other assets, or decide you’re going to live with a different breakdown.

What do you estimate the return will be?
4½–8%, plus however much the property appreciates, which we estimate will be nothing for the next 3-5 years.

We keep score when building wealth. Amazingly, some people haven’t figured this out yet or refuse to acknowledge it. If you think investing has an emotional component, and that either being a nice person or playing hunches is part of the game, please stop reading Control Your Cash and find something less demanding. Seriously. See, we said “please”. Didn’t hurt your feelings or anything. You should be happy.

What exactly is the investment?
A 2
nd floor, 1-bedroom/1-bath 770 ft2 condo in an above-average part of town. The condo’s listed at $50,000 and approved for a short sale*.

Meanwhile, nearby condos rent for $650-750 a month.  Estimated annual expenses read like this. (This is something called an annual property operating data worksheet. Download it at your leisure.)

The above question is self-explanatory, right? And its relevance should be self-evident. If it isn’t, return to kindergarten and start over. We’ll be waiting.

———-

Anyhow, this investment allows for multiple variables that affect ROI (that’s return on investment, in case you forgot.) Variables include things like rents, and whether you can buy the property as owner-occupied, which means you should be able to get a cheaper loan with lower closing costs. Here’s what we mean:

There are two primary ways to buy this condo as an investment if you have neither the cash up front nor excellent credit. Find a partner, or incorporate.

1. Find a partner (a joint venture.)

An investor lends you $50,000 interest-free to complete the sale. You buy the house and live in it.

Nothing’s free, of course. Under this form of owner occupancy, you pay the investor 70% of the house’s net operating income (i.e., the rent.) Another 10% of the rent goes into a reserve maintenance account – out of which you pay for things like appliance repair. Which you shouldn’t need to if you have a home warranty. But there’ll always be some unexpected expense that a warranty won’t cover: stucco repair, interior paint, etc.

What about the remaining 20% of the rent? That’s yours to keep. Yes, under this arrangement you pay only 80% of fair-market rent. On the other hand, doing it this way you can’t write off your expenses on your tax return.

Who would work out a scheme like this? Lots of people. It’s a perfect vehicle for a father who wants to help his kid buy a home and still earn a return.

Or

2. Form a limited liability company (details here, here, here, and here.)

You and the person who’s lending you money are partners in the LLC, which becomes the official and legal owner of the property. Once you create the LLC and it takes ownership of the property, it’s the sole owner: nobody and nothing else. It’s not as if you own x% of the property and your partner owns 100-x%. The LLC owns it all. You own a particular share of the LLC, but that’s a different issue.

Each LLC has an operating agreement that lays out the details of the deal: such as who gets to write expenses off, how you’ll split profits when you sell the property, and specific duties for each partner. The LLC also protects you from unlimited liability in case a tenant or a visitor decides to sue. They can sue for $1 trillion if they want, and even have a case, but they can’t get more than your investment in the LLC.

With this example, the investor again lends you $50,000 interest-free. You find a tenant, charge her the going rate and again keep 10% in a maintenance account.

This scheme works for partners with disparate skills – e.g. one partner with the time and expertise to find the property (in this example, you) and the other with most of the money.

What’s the downside?

Property values could drop even further, meaning you might need years just to break even. If the property doesn’t rent immediately, your return will decline.

The renter might damage the property. This is why you qualify prospective tenants and collect a security deposit. If you really want to avoid headaches, spend 10% of the rent on a property manager. If you value your time at all, hiring a property manager will pay for itself quickly.

You and your partner might disagree on how to manage the place and, when it comes time, how to sell it. You solve this with an operating agreement, one that looks something like this:

That’s pretty much it. Just make sure that every conceivable subject of potential dispute finds its way into the operating agreement, and that you register your LLC in a state that’s business-friendly. That usually means Delaware or Nevada. Or failing that, your home state. (You can live and operate in, say, North Dakota but register in Maine if you want. It’s totally legal.) Just don’t register in California, and never New York: their LLCs don’t protect you enough.

The old pessimistic saw says you have to have money to make money. That’s not true if you leverage someone else’s.

*Selling a house short means begging the lender’s representatives to take less than they originally agreed to, on the theory that a wounded bird in the hand is worth more than a potentially rabid pair in the bush. Details here.

**This post is featured in the 1/4/11 edition of the real estate investing carnival**

**This post is also featured in the Carnival of the Road to Financial Independence**

Silence. It’s just good business.

Tenant with eviction notice

How bad is our tenant? This is an interview with our prospective new tenants, a family of Gypsy bear herders

The Control Your Cash authors own an office building. In a couple of weeks, the tenant is supposed to start the 3rd and final year of the lease. It calls for a fixed annual rent increase.

The tenant was late with the rent once before. That time, the good-cop author waived the 10% late fee after listening to an excuse from the tenant’s octogenarian chief financial officer. The good-cop author stressed that this would be a one-time-only thing.

A few weeks ago, the tenant asked that the rent not go up next year. He offered nothing in return, he just hoped he’d get $6000 by asking for it. Maybe he thought he had leverage – the building’s been half-empty for some time, leading him to believe it’s a renter’s market. Perhaps, but a contract is a contract.

We refused, and December’s check never arrived. The bad-cop author left a polite and unambiguous voicemail with the boss and spoke with the CFO, who refused to give a straight answer to the complex and nuanced question, “Did you send a check?”

The tenant himself called the good-cop author a few minutes later, claiming that the bad cop threatened and disparaged the CFO (he didn’t.) The tenant added gratuitous lies, such as “the CFO thought he meant January’s rent.” The bad cop overheard this, grabbed the phone, stated his position, and the tenant started spewing profanities and, swear to God, asked if anyone would be interested in “tak(ing) it outside.”

Indisputable conclusions:

-in Western society, the standard strategy for requesting a favor involves groveling and pretending to like the person who can dispense the favor. Berating and threatening are almost never part of that strategy. Therefore,
-the tenant has no intention of sticking around past December.

Additional points: the tenant opted to communicate exclusively via text from that point, and exclusively with the good cop. In fact, one of the texts stated that the bad cop “is not to contact us anymore.” Yes, the delinquent tenant is making demands while stealing office space.

Also, the tenant stated that he’d refuse to pay the 10% late fee. He asked the good cop if she really wanted to “destroy this business relationship” and if she’d want to “lawyer up” in lieu of caving into all the tenant’s demands. These would include, apparently, refusing to pay the current month’s rent. Nowhere in his diatribe was there a word about where December’s rent check is.

In the later chapters of Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense (available at Amazon and Barnes & Noble), we argue that if you’re going to invest in houses and rent them out, hire a property manager and pay her 10% to assume control of your headaches. Commercial property doesn’t typically work that way, and shouldn’t, but we at least weighed the benefits of hiring a property manager while dealing with this idiot tenant.

We didn’t get mad. We sent a cold and impersonal email to an eviction company and hired them. They charge $200 to put a notice on the door telling the renter he has 10 days to pay the balance (which just got $200 larger) or get out. The renter would still be legally obligated for not only December’s rent, but the remaining year on the lease. The security deposit we initially collected covers only a small part of that.

So he started using intermediaries. We got a call from the broker who originally engineered the deal, a quasi-friend with no dog in this fight. This is the equivalent of having an argument with your significant other and placing a call to the person who introduced you. We didn’t bother calling back the broker who, to her credit, had only two things to ask the renter: What am I supposed to do about this? and Did you pay your rent?

Then yesterday, a voicemail from someone we’d never heard of. Another real estate broker, but one who talked as though she was representing the tenant in court (“Mr. Smith really wants to pay the rent, and hopes both parties can agree to a mutually beneficial solution.”)

Huh?

If the tenant’s talking to other brokers, he clearly wants out of his lease. Which we’d grant, as soon as he cuts a $70,000 check for the entire remainder of the term. His threats to “lawyer up” notwithstanding, his would be one of the weakest cases in the history of jurisprudence. And why the tenant chose an intermediary whose very identity shows his hand made no sense at all.

The point of all this is manifold for people who want to make money by selling their goods and services to others (which is the only ethical way to do it):

a. If you’re going to be in a position where people can potentially owe you thousands, you need a written contract. (We did.)

b. When previously semi-reasonable vendors/customers/clients/tenants start acting irrationally, sever the relationship before they have a chance to. At least then you’re in control. Even if this tenant had never been late with the rent, why extend the lease of someone so bellicose? Let alone give him a price break.

c. STAY EMOTIONLESS. Take feelings into account in your personal relationships, not your professional ones. If you don’t, you will stay as poor as someone who buys lottery tickets and puts them on her credit card. Crap, this idea is so profound that it should have been a chapter in the book.

We could have made forceful but non-threatening calls to the tenant. We could have shown up (tempting, given his offer of a fight). We could have done what most people in these situations do, which is engage in unproductive conversations that don’t change anything (“When are you going to pay the rent?” “What do you mean you’re not going to pay the late fee?”, et al.) As if he’s going to give worthwhile answers.

Instead, put the phone down and don’t answer his calls (or any intermediaries’.) Because unless he says “here’s a cashier’s check for the full amount”, which he won’t, there’s nothing to talk about and anything beyond that is a waste of time. Hiring a pro and having the law on your side (plus a personal guarantee, agreed to at the start of the lease) makes life a lot less hectic.

**This post is featured in 2011’s First Carnival of Money Stories**

**This popular post is also featured in the Carnival of Wealth #19**

Reuse, recycle. (Already reduced)

Neptune

Neptune. Stayed undiscovered for centuries, has no people. Now THAT's a smarter planet.

This post ran on Free From Broke back in June. Let’s see how prescient it looks today.

Why do people get excited when their favorite retailer holds a sale, but not when Wall Street does?

Let’s start with the obligatory disclaimer – this is not an encouragement nor a discouragement to buy or sell particular securities, stocks carry risk, consult a financial advisor but you don’t have to, etc.  That was for that infinitesimally small segment of the population that is a) literate enough to read this post, yet b) dumb enough to do whatever a disembodied online voice suggests.  There, now you can read the post absolved of any obligation to think.

Most investors know, in theory, that it’s foolish to buy at the top of the market and sell at the bottom. (Of course, human nature means that the opposite is true in practice – otherwise the top and bottom wouldn’t be where they are.)  But it’s equally foolish to assume that the market will carry you along indefinitely if you just buy a flat representation of it and don’t research at all.  We have 12+ years of real-world evidence of that.  Factoring in inflation, the Dow has risen by an average of .4% annually since February of 1997.  Your index fund would have been better off if it had collected tin cans since the Packers last won a Super Bowl. (1.3% annually now. The Packers are 8-to-1 to win the Super Bowl.)

There is such a thing as overdiversification. You might find stability in a comprehensive index fund, but it’s impossible to find any significant value.  Buying a basket of Dow stocks, or something similar like a Wilshire 5000 index fund, will likely give fantastic returns over an 80-year period.  If you plan on not waiting until you’re 115 years old to enjoy your money, there are more targeted ways to go about attempting to build wealth in the stock market.

Instead, look at companies that are temporarily wounded, i.e. whose stock sells at a discount. Earlier this year, when the global CEO of Toyota (NYSE: TM) was being grilled on Capitol Hill for selling cars to people who confused the brake with the accelerator, the company’s stock sank.  But some fleeting bad PR can’t negate a decades-long reputation for value and quality.  A few weeks after our demonstrative congressmen and senators finally pulled the curtain on their combination political theater/witch trial, Toyota stock had quietly gained 15%.

Around the time Toyota emerged from a bruising at the unfair hands of public opinion, British Petroleum (NYSE: BP) made Toyota’s problems look trivial.  BP traded at $60.48 the day the Deepwater Horizon spill began.  Today it’s at $36.52, a 60% drop.  (And now it’s at 42.81, an annualized 37% return from when we recommended buying. Why are we not giving stock tips professionally? Oh, right, the licensing exams.) The rig’s manufacturer, Transocean (NYSE: RIG), has fallen from $92.03 to $50.04 over the same period, a 46% decline.  (And today it’s at 70.93, an annualized 101% return. AHEM.) Fortunately for Transocean, it’s in an industry with few players.  Also, most people had barely heard of it since it doesn’t sell directly to the public.  (When was the last time you bought an oil rig?)  This distinguishes Transocean from BP, which plasters its logo everywhere and goes out of its way to embed itself in the public consciousness.  Thanks to that insistence, almost everyone identifies the Gulf of Mexico spill with BP more than they do Transocean.

Both BP and Transocean have otherwise healthy financials that can normally withstand a one-time event. Then again, Deepwater Horizon is some event.  But a wounded company isn’t a doomed company: despite the Exxon Valdez disaster, ExxonMobil went from pariah to the world’s most profitable company in just a few years.  Johnson & Johnson rebounded after the Tylenol scare of 1982 and came back stronger than ever.  There are several ways to murder a company along with its stock: obsolescence (Atari), poor economics (General Motors) and rampant crime (Enron) are three of the most efficient.  But for a temporarily disabled company with a history of success and goodwill (in the general sense, not the accounting sense)?  A resurgence is more likely than you think.  Don’t confuse a broken bone with a bullet wound through the cranium.

One more time: there’s always value somewhere in the stock market, but very rarely can you make money simply by buying into the market as a whole.  In fact, the times when the market (as a whole) rises fastest are when the gains are most dubious and tentative – case in point, the dot-com bubble and ensuing crash.  More accurately, there’s always value in the stock market among particular entrants.  Finding the ones whose stock prices have suffered for no better reason than that of public perception is as wise a place as any to start.

Apropos of nothing, Walmart might be looking at a sexual discrimination suit with 1.4 million plaintiffs this week. The stock lost $47 million in market capitalization in one trading day this week. A good time to sell? Start this post again at the beginning.