In college? Switch majors. TODAY.

 

Did she major in a) philosophy, b) drama, or c) applied mathematics?

Problem: a college’s engineering students have futuristic ideas, but no clue how to monetize them. That same college’s business students have grand capitalistic designs, but nothing to market.

You can probably figure out the solution.

We’ve said repeatedly at Control Your Cash that formal higher “education” isn’t an absolute good. And we’ll continue to put the word “education” in quotes if people are going to classify Montclair State’s “How to Watch Television” as no less worthwhile than MIT’s Atomistic Modeling and Simulation of Materials and Structures. (No dismissive quotes required for that course description.)

State legislators and impressionable parents throughout the country transfer far too much taxpayer money into the pockets of directionless adolescents looking for a place to drink, protest and sleep late while deferring productivity. The tangibly beneficial college and university courses continue to get outnumbered by dross like everything listed here.

And then there’s the Cambridge of the Mojave, the University of Nevada-Las Vegas.
Indulge us with some time for a little local content.

To most people who think about this kind of thing, UNLV is a punchline – a basketball factory, a commuter school for unambitious commuters, the kind of institution that’s emblematic of the same faux learning that we’ve spent the last few paragraphs deriding and whose only redeeming feature is its world-renowned hotel management school.

Not quite. UNLV is also home to a groundbreaking program that should revolutionize post-secondary education: a partnership between the two most crucial schools at the college, engineering and business. (UNLV doesn’t teach medicine.)

(Note: Control Your Cash co-founder Betty is also a co-founder of UNLV’s Center for Entrepreneurship, known colloquially as the “E-Center”. Betty attended Northern Arizona University for one semester, realized her fortune lay elsewhere, and sought and achieved it. With no student loans to worry about paying off. Years later, she realized that the common financial sense she implemented in her own life barely existed in academia. But rather than dismiss the typical university education as largely pointless, she committed resources to finding a way to make it meaningful.)

The UNLV engineering/business partnership began as the fusion of two separate but easily unifiable ideas. Since 2000, the curriculum requires senior engineering students to form small teams and enter a design competition. Simply put, the teams have to invent something practical. And their brainchildren have been not just feasible, but inspiring: a cane that uses sonar (for blind people), motorcycle headlights that see around corners, etc.

A few hundred yards away, business students were doing something similar: creating plans and projections for potential businesses. The last couple of years your humble bloggers have had the pleasure of serving as judges for the business students’ contest, and we’ve seen some impressive proposals. They include the group that was going to import and distribute a revolutionary weatherproofing compound from South Korea, and the “micro-farmer” team who wanted to grow vegetables on abandoned urban lots. Some of the other ideas were less marketable than they were creative, still others were quite the opposite. But the very act of conceiving and developing these ideas did and will do far more good for the world than the nearby English class looking for meaning in the short stories of Jack Kerouac.

The trouble was that none of the engineering projects ever got off the ground. (Figuratively speaking, particularly in the case of the dolly that lifts 300-pound payloads 3 feet in the air.) Meanwhile the business projects, while some of them had potential, weren’t exactly recalibrating the boundaries of human endeavor.

So the deans of the departments got together and meted out a little interdiscipline. For full credit, the engineering students had to partner with the business students (and vice versa) to develop a viable plan. For the engineers, it meant developing an appreciation for normally mundane tasks like securing warehouses, filing paperwork, and learning how to market. For the aspiring MBAs, it meant gathering the requisite technical knowledge about how moneymaking gadgets make money. (Dr. Andrew Hardin, director of the Center for Entrepreneurship, got the inspiration for this from a similar program at Washington State University.)

You need both the yin and the yang. This is just one of countless examples, but there’s a $500 Universal Corporation all-in-one remote control at Control Your Cash headquarters that contains 43 buttons and 6 screens, most of which never get used. The device is supposed to control the TV, the DVD player, the satellite radio, the AM/FM, the CD players, the iPod and probably one or two other things. Three years in we still haven’t mastered this leviathan of overengineering, because we can’t be bothered to spend the necessary couple of days decoding its indecipherable user’s manual. Seriously, we don’t need 80 equalization pre-settings (“Classical”, “Bass Reducer”, “Sports”) for the tuner. We’re not Jimmy Iovine.

A competent business management team would have simplified the remote while maintaining its primary selling feature – the ability to control every electronic component in the house. The team would have hired an erudite technical writer to translate the instructions into something a layperson will want to comprehend, and packaged the remote as something more necessity than luxury. We can only wonder what engineering breakthroughs never make it to market, for lack of marketing.

When teachers’ unions in your state complain that you need to fork over more tax money for education, ask them if and how they’re prepping kids for crucial programs like UNLV’s engineering/business partnership. And making a legitimate difference in the world, not a theoretical one.

TONIGHT, the winners of the 2011 competition do a dress rehearsal for the forthcoming tri-state competition. If you’re in the neighborhood, swing by and see how the future doesn’t merely appear.

**This article is featured in the Totally Money Carnival #21-Memorial Day Edition**

**This popular post is also featured in The Carnival of Wealth #42**

Everyone’s Jean Freaking Chatzky

He's a FOREIGN EXCHANGE student. (Which will make sense in a minute.)

Once a week or so, we get solicited by someone offering to write us a guest post. The offer usually comes as a template, and about 15% of them get the name of the blog wrong (“I really love your work here at    Consumerism Commentary .”) Even when they get our name right, the introductory email almost always tells us all we need to know about the submitter’s writing style (it’s abysmal.)

Last week the folks at something called Forex Traders hit us up. Their point lady was very polite and she followed through when we grilled her on our standards.

The Forex Traders post follows, verbatim. While we don’t like to bother cleaning up other people’s stilted writing (which is far more work than writing a post of our own), we do love to editorialize. So here’s the one-of-a-kind Control Your Cash treatment in a whole new written form: literary criticism (Forex’s gold in this color.) Enjoy.

“Buy-and-Hold” Investing Strategies May Be Extinct Down the Road

Almost everything’s extinct down the road. Just ask trilobites. Not sure what the author’s getting at with the headline. Clearly he thinks something will supplant buy-and-hold investing, but doesn’t think that that replacement is important enough to warrant top billing.

One never-ending “paradox” in the investment community is that, while the investment advisor on the consumer retail front is pushing a “buy-and-hold” strategy for his clients, the back-office traders for the same firm are plying their helter-skelter quantitative trading strategies for all they are worth, and that has translated into millions of dollars of profits for the investment banking community alone.

Wow, way to introduce your topic. Seriously, what are you saying? Here’s a Control Your Cash translation, for our anglophone readers:

Investment advisors encourage you to buy-and-hold. But they make money on commissions, so shouldn’t they preach the opposite?

See what we did there? We went from 66 words to 20 and crystallized your argument. Glad to help.

The back office abhors competition or even the notion of sharing these gains with the general public at large.

“General public at large.” Because “public” wouldn’t have made it clear, so we expanded it to “general public”, and apparently we still don’t think you’d understand what that means, so we went with “general public at large.”
The internet is officially too democratized.

If an investor truly wants above average returns, then he must pick and choose the hot sectors at will.

Write in the second person, you pompously verbose tool. (See? Like that.) You’re not writing to “an investor”. You’re writing to the person reading. Who will appreciate being thought of as a person and not a designation.

Prudent investing may still involve research, locating a value equation that suits your tolerance for risk, making sure that your selections are well diversified, and then pruning and fine tuning your portfolio as time goes by. What has changed is the process for achieving each of these objectives. The era of globalization is upon us.

Oh, for Christ’s sake. “The era of globalization is upon us”? Thanks for that. It’s true, you know. Computers and the internet and jet travel have made it easy to talk to people in London and Paris like they’re just down the street. Dude, the transatlantic cable was laid 150 YEARS AGO.

Sorry, can’t take this anymore. From here on in, we’re going strikethrough on the rest of this bile. Our rewrite will follow. Damn; remember what we said about editing guest posts being more work than writing originals? Maybe one day we’ll learn.

Investing cannot thrive on mere domestic issues alone. Every full-service broker can connect you with any exchange around the globe, but the safest avenue may be to utilize the plethora of Exchange-Traded Funds (“ETF”) that have sprung onto the investing scene in the past decade.

Emerging markets have been the success story over the past decade, and the best way to invest in this space is through an ETF designed for the purpose. Offerings can focus on a specific country or region, like Asia, but when you invest overseas, you must accept some currency trading risk along with the ride. As long as the U.S. Dollar weakens during your holding period, currency appreciation can actually work to your benefit.
Hedging your forex risk is not recommended for the inexperienced, but, by keeping an eye on the Dollar’s general value, you can opt in or out at the most opportune times.

The world has also gone crazy over forex trading during the past decade as well. This popularity has more to do with flexibility and the advance of technical trading platforms, but you need not jump into that market for the short term. If expectations are for a weaker Dollar, and they will continue to be as long as the Fed pursues its quantitative easing program agenda, then there are ETF’s for currency, too. In a weakening situation, the Swiss France (sic) could be a potential bet. If you want a position in the “Swissie”, the “FXF” ETF is invested in the “USD CHF” currency pair and is there for the taking.

ETF’s have the additional benefit of providing instant diversification. No more having to follow twenty-five stocks in your portfolio. Invest in sectors by choosing from a variety of ETF’s. Domestic companies, emerging markets, precious metals, and commodities can now coexist in the same portfolio. As for reviews, check the performance of the few funds that you hold, prune and fine tune as you like, and buy and sell on the exchange as with any other security. Investing in emerging markets was never so accessible.

Translated, he said:

Buy an exchange-traded fund; a mutual fund that, you guessed it, trades on a public exchange. There are ETFs that focus on particular sectors of the economy, or on particular securities (commodities, precious metals, etc.) You can buy ETFs that concentrate on a particular region of the world. That means you’ll have to pay attention to exchange rates. And that means you can hedge a weak U.S. dollar.
Which brings us to trading currencies themselves. But rather than invest directly in baht or rubles, you can buy a currency ETF. For instance, the Rydex CurrencyShares Swiss Franc Trust, which trades on NYSEArca, a division of the New York Stock Exchange.

Why would I buy that instead of just buying francs?

You shouldn’t. The only advantage to a currency ETF is that if you’ve already got a mutual fund through a place that offers currency ETFs, you can have both accounts in one place.

The end.

Addendum:

The headline, which didn’t make much sense when we read it blindly, makes even less sense now.
We’re not above shilling here at Control Your Cash (we’ve been fellating the Amazon Kindle for months now, and even the small version is a chore to wrap one’s lips around), but it’s got to be a product or service we believe in. Which currency ETFs aren’t.

And if you don’t want your clumsy, long-winded, misspelled guest post goofed on and dismembered, send it to someone else.

**This article is featured in the Carnival of Wealth #39**

It’s not what you earn. It’s what you negotiate I

Meet this week's winner of the non sequitur street sign award

Time and again, it’s the one complaint we hear most often from people who spend more money and earn less than they’d like – “I suck at negotiating.” “I couldn’t sell space heaters to Eskimos.” “Not only did I pay the seller’s asking price, I gave him a 15% tip and offered to spend the next couple of weekends painting his house. And pay for the paint.”

There are plenty of books about negotiation – Ron Shapiro and Mark Jankowski’s The Power of Nice is worthwhile if you can find a partner to do the exercises with – but none will teach you anywhere near as much as actual bargaining and deal-cutting will. As anyone who’s read a book on automotive maintenance knows, theory is no substitute for practice.

Here’s a quick and cheap way to build valuable negotiating experience, with very little downside. Best of all, it’ll make you feel like an aspiring criminal.

Ticket scalping.

Particularly, live scalping. None of that StubHub child’s play. We’re talking about the kind of negotiation where you actually have to face the other party in the transaction, should a transaction occur.

That last clause is critical. There doesn’t have to be a deal. Millions of people carry the mistaken belief that sealing a deal is necessarily an accomplishment. It isn’t. Most negotiations are worth walking away from, at least temporarily. Time can often be your friend, especially if the other party’s facing a deadline.

The standard example for ticket scalping is sports, but concerts also work if the artist is big enough. If you live in a city with an NHL or NBA team, one scalping session – either as a buyer or a seller – will teach you enough to go into your next car or house negotiation in a far better position.

Strategies differ if you’re a buyer or a seller. We’ll address each individually.

BUYER:

Say you’re in Des Moines a week from tomorrow and want to see Bon Jovi at the Wells Fargo Center.

1. Find out how much tickets officially cost. In this case, they range from $20 to $130. That venue diagram is critical.

2. Spend a minute on eBay and 30 seconds on Craig’s List to determine going rates, which rarely match list price.

3. Determine how badly you want to see this show. Assign a dollar figure to it if you can. “I’d love to be on the floor, but not for a penny more than $150.” If you’ll spend the rest of your life in regret if you miss the show, then presumably you should have bought tickets beforehand. This isn’t Led Zeppelin at the O2 Arena or the Super Bowl. There’ll be other Bon Jovi shows. Jon will still be dreamy.

If the event is something you can live without seeing, it’s time to have some fun.

4. Go to the venue no more than 20 minutes before showtime. That is, get yourself there in enough time to have parked and walked to the ticket window (which, of course, is where scalpers congregate.)

You don’t want to get there any earlier. If you linger without visible purpose for an hour, you’ll betray yourself as someone who’s looking for tickets and will be propositioned by any number of professional scalpers. Any scalper who propositions you will force you to make a decision then and there. If you want to defer your decision until shortly before game time, your bargaining power with that scalper will rapidly decrease. He (they’re always male) then might even refuse to sell to you out of spite, which is an option for him if there’s at least one other buyer visible.

If you haven’t memorized the seating chart, bringing it with you wouldn’t hurt, although you don’t want to tip your hand as a naïf by making the chart visible to the regular scalpers. (Who’ll be easy to spot, and even easier to hear.)

Next week, we show you how to go in for the kill.