The Best Hotel Values in America, Volume II

How do they do it? They buy fewer vowels, and pass the savings on to you!

Welcome to Part 2 ofour look at America’s biggest business-traveler hotel chains.  We looked at room prices and amenities for 5 different chains, and chains of chains. See our previous post for which features we deem important, and which we can live without. The chains we looked at were Hampton Inn (a division of Hilton), La Quinta, Marriott and its sub-brands, Holiday Inn, and Choice Hotels and its sub-brands.

Marriott includes:

  • SpringHill Suites
  • Courtyard
  • Marriott (just “Marriott”, no qualifier except “Hotels and Resorts”)
  • everything from Ritz-Carlton to something called EDITION Hotels. Just in case you thought the medial capital letter in “SpringHill” was douchey, they’ve given you an entire word surrendered to the typographic insanity of contemporary branding.

Choice Hotels include:

  • Comfort Inn
  • Comfort Suites
  • Quality Inn
  • Sleep Inn
  • a bunch of others such as Clarion, Rodeway Inn, and EconoLodge that don’t really fit the definition of a business-traveler hotel. (The first too Park Place, the second and third too Baltic Avenue.)

Of course room prices, even intra-chain ones, fluctuate daily. We’re not going to examine a year’s worth of prices among all chains for a post that’s going to sit at the top of our page for 3 days at most, so we selected hotels closest to the airport in 5 disparate cities (Minneapolis; Macon, Georgia; Seattle; Lubbock, Texas; St. George, Utah.) Within reason, mind you: if you had to travel an extra mile from the airport to save $30 at another hotel in the chain, we went with the cheaper hotel. This was for a 1-night stay on April 1, 2011 – a day near no major holiday, nor any big local events that we know of. Get ready for some self-explanatory charts!

Price ($)MINMACSEALUBSTGAvg
Hampton Inn999584.1592.6595.2093.20
La Quinta696982759477.80
Marriott59C99M104C130C159C110.20
Holiday Inn84.1580899611392.43
Choice63.15F51Q57Q76.50Q87M66.9

M=generic Marriott, C=Courtyard
F=Comfort Inn, Q=Quality Inn

Smoke?MINMACSEALUBSTG
Hampton InnNOYESYESNOYES
La QuintaYESYESYESYESNO
MarriottNONOYESYESYES
Holiday InnYESNOYESYESYES
ChoiceYESYESYESNONO
Internet?MINMACSEALUBSTG
Hampton Innwirelesswiredwiredwiredwireless
La Quintawirelesswiredwirelesswiredwireless
Marriottwiredwireless ($10)wiredwirelesswireless
Holiday Innwiredwirelesswirelesswirelesswireless
Choicewirelesswiredwirelesswirelesswireless
Breakfast/
microwave & fridge?
MINMACSEALUBSTG
Hampton InnYES/NOYES/NOYES/NOYES/NOYES/YES
La QuintaYES/NOYES/YESYES/NOYES/NOYES/YES
MarriottNO/NONO/NONO/NONO/NONO/NO
Holiday InnNO/NOYES/YESNO/YESYES/YESYES/YES
ChoiceYES/NOYES/YESYES/YESYES/YESNO/YES
Laundry?MINMACSEALUBSTG
Hampton Innvaletselfvaletvaletvalet
La Quintaselfselfselfnoneself
Marriottselfselfnonenoneself
Holiday Innselfselfselfselfself
Choicevaletselfselfselfself

Observations:

Amazingly, at least to us, most hotels in 2011 allow smoking. The good news is that in the hotels that do, fewer than 10% of the rooms are devoted to accommodating the practice of that vile, repulsive, loathsome, nauseating habit. May we one day as a nation progress to the point where prejudice and bigotry are forever things of the past, except when practiced against that class of Cro-Magnons who pollute the air far more tangibly than any coal refinery does. But given that almost all rooms forbid smoking, no wonder it’s usually easy to get a non-smoking room.

The Holiday Inn in St. George welcomes pets for $25, a good deal considering that most hotels we surveyed would just as soon have Fluffy and Mittens sleep in your car.  The Marriott in Lubbock charges $100, which is almost the same thing.

The Twin Cities airport Holiday Inn doesn’t comp you on breakfast, but does offer a $20 voucher. Not per person, per room. At least one CYC author could eat $10 worth of hotel breakfast food in his sleep. And while the folks at the Holiday Inn in St. George apparently love animals, they also close the laundry room between 11 pm and 7 am, a cruel joke to play on anyone who’s been hiking Zion Canyon all day in the middle of summer.

Walmart sells microwaves for $55 and mini-fridges (with freezer) for $75.  These chains could buy thousands of each for what, 80% of Walmart retail? Amortize those prices over the useful life of each appliance, and it wouldn’t add more than a few pennies a day to the cost of a room. Yet most hotels in our sample still don’t let you do some rudimentary cooking.

The march to full wireless internet access continues. Curiously, it appears that wireless internet is being adopted faster than the relatively ancient technologies of refrigeration and microwaving. If wirelessness is important to you (e.g. if you’re traveling as a pair and can only plug one computer into an Ethernet cable at a time), it doesn’t hurt to request a room close to the router upon check-in. Or ask the clerk not to put you in a room in which people traditionally complain about the reception.

To us, valet laundry “service” is the opposite of a convenience. Which would you prefer to return to when you’ve been in meetings all day – expensively laundered clothes that are hopefully all accounted for, or being able to pay $1.50 to clean your clothes at your leisure? In those hotels that don’t simply have a coin-operated laundry room, getting your clothes cleaned can be more trouble than it’s worth. The author once spent two weeks in China cleaning his clothes in hotel bathtubs. We’re supposed to be beyond that in the Western Hemisphere.

Marriott doesn’t exactly offer value. They do restrict smoking as much as anyone does, but as we’re finding out, that doesn’t seem to make that much of a difference. Marriott’s maddening series of sub-brands can make it confusing to find a hotel sometimes, plus as you can see, their prices vary the most of any chain we measured. They’re also the one chain that’s embraced the European tactic of adding a separate charge for going online. If you’re in Macon, look for a Wi-Fi hotspot in the McDonald’s parking lot next door.

Our conclusion?

If this were a scientific experiment, our hypothesis would have been that Hampton Inn is the best in its class. The desk clerks are almost always polite and helpful, and the breakfast alone usually saves us far more than (what we originally assumed was) any tiny difference in price between chains. But if we had to pick a winner, we’d go with Choice Hotels – not only do they win on price in 4 out of 5 cities (losing by 50¢ in the 5th), but they have less smoking, more kitchen appliances, more complimentary food and more convenient internet access than anyone else.

**This post is featured in the Festival of Frugality #270-Spring is Coming (One of These Days) Edition**

and

Yakezie Carnival: March 6th Edition

3 personal finance books that aren’t horrible

Don't cry. Your copy of Buffettology should be in there somewhere

The list itself is tiny, although this introduction isn’t. Most personal finance books are garbage.

Anything that includes worksheets, don’t buy. It’s a gimmick to increase the page count of a book, and besides, you’re never going to fill out the worksheets. No one does.

Ramit Sethi will tell you you’re an idiot. Dave Ramsey will patronize you. Suze Orman will draw you into an endless maelstrom of ancillary CDs, DVDs, sassy hair and pantsuits. The personal finance bloggers who hawk books – they know who they are – will do something even worse, which is repackage patently obvious information and call it a book. If you need to be told that you should spend less than you earn, build an emergency fund, and comparison shop before buying something expensive; and you couldn’t have determined that on your own, a reading list should be the last thing on your mind. Worry about food and shelter first, then move onto mastering fire and understanding the wheel.

Here are some personal finance books we don’t hate. Again, it’s a microscopic list.
The Intelligent Investor – Benjamin Graham with annotation by Jason Zweig

Benjamin Graham is the guy who taught Warren Buffett everything he knows. He wrote this guide to stock investing a long time ago, in a vernacular that can put you to sleep at times. Zweig, who writes for The Wall Street Journal, freshens the work up and contemporizes it.

The Wall Street Journal Complete Personal Finance Guidebook – Jeff Opdyke

It’s informative and comprehensive despite being short. Still, that didn’t stop Robert Rubin. The only downside is that Opdyke is the guy who writes that insufferable “Love & Money” weekend column that lots of local newspapers pick up for their business sections. Endless stories about what it’s like to have a wife and kids while holding down a job, something no one in the history of the world did before Opdyke. Fortunately, he mostly keeps this book free of such tedium.

Wow. That’s all we could think of? Apparently.

That just reinforces why we wrote Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense. It was the personal finance book we wanted to read, but no one had yet written it, so…

Get our book, and get it on Kindle. Buy a Kindle – the latest regulation-size one is $139 from Amazon and you can probably get a new one for less on eBay. You can take notes with the keyboard, and another labor-saving feature is that you can select memorable clips with the press of a button (they end up in their own easily accessible file.) Beats using a highlighter and hoping it doesn’t bleed over to the preceding or succeeding page. If you’re worrying about the formatting of Control Your Cash on a Kindle, don’t. The charts are easy to read and the footnotes line up just fine.

(The Kindle endorsement is moot if you don’t read, of course. But then again, you’re on a website that’s mostly text, and you’re on that website’s recommended reading list page.)

**This post is featured in the Totally Money Carnival: Presidential Quotes Edition**

&

**The Festival of Stocks Berkshire Hathaway 2010 Annual Letter Edition**

Fixed-rate mortgages are boring. Get something fun instead!

Welcome to Recycle Friday. This week, a post that originally ran on LenPenzo.com, updated for posterity.

If this page appears in your mortgage document, RUN. Also, mortgages shouldn't have sines and tangents in them

Should you walk away from your mortgage just because your home depreciated?

So you refinanced. Or bought too much house. You divided the mortgage payments by your income, and decided you could swing something a few percentage points higher than the recommended 25–33 because the market was rising and your house would make you rich just by existing.

You relied on speculation as an investment strategy (not even your own speculation, but other people’s.) But your house got cheaper, maybe cheaper than what you bought it for. That’s called “losing money on an investment,” which happens all the time, but people think it oughtn’t when your bedroom and kitchen are part of the investment.

The market might bounce back. If you’re 7 years in, lots can happen in the remaining 23 on a 30-year mortgage.

When you lose money on a stock, your brokerage account might get wiped out, but no one will see the evidence of this except you. Owe more than your vehicle is worth, and it might get repoed. Fine, tell people you sold it and always wanted to ride the bus instead. But stop making payments on a house, and there’s a letter from the constable on the door, maybe some yellow tape involved – hard to keep that quiet from the neighbors. Also, people getting forcibly removed from “their” houses (it’s yours and not the bank’s only after you pay the entire mortgage) make for striking photo and political opportunities. After all, bankers are evil. Meanwhile, it’s the working stiffs just trying to make ends meet who get raked over the coals. (Wow, a sentence composed entirely of clichés. Mike Lupica approves.)

Some people who make enough to cover the mortgage dump the house anyway – the strategic default. They assume investment values only move in one direction. According to Experian, that includes 20% of defaulters.

This is hiding behind the law. Stop making payments, and it’s not like you’ll be evicted that week. It takes months, even years. The idea here is to take the mortgage payments and put them toward, say, your credit card balance, figuring the lender will gladly renegotiate a contract you signed in order to get some sort of return on its investment.

Some borrowers think this is fine because if the lender kicks you out, it’ll be tough to sell the house to someone else in a down market anyway. The lender at least wants the house to stay lived in.

This is nonsense. Strategic defaults hurt everyone.

A strategic default does to your credit score what Michael Vick did to underperforming fighting dogs. You’ll never be able to borrow either a) again, or b) until Congress and the White House decide that so many people need to improve their credit scores that it just wouldn’t be fair to let some insidious little 3-digit numbers have such power over those people’s lives.

What’s the solution? Well, no politician of either party wants the other accusing him or her of standing by while old ladies and cripples are being kicked out of “their” houses. The government would then essentially renegotiate mortgage contracts, setting caps on future ones and insisting the lenders take less. Under this type of forced renegotiation, the borrowers don’t even have to sack up and face the lenders themselves.

Besides, co-workers, professors, and the blonde lady on TV say defaulting is fine. And for PR reasons, lenders are hunting down deficient borrowers about as aggressively as the feds go after illegal immigrants.

Say you walk away from your mortgage, mail your keys to your lender, then rent somewhere. Your now-former neighbor follows, then a third. No matter how swank a neighborhood you deserted, the lawns turn brown and the pools green because no one’s living in the houses. Which reduces the value of the remaining houses. Now the people who stayed behind and haven’t (yet) defaulted watch their homes’ values decline. Which means they’ll likely owe more than their houses are worth, making it more likely that those folks will default. Continue like this, and you end up with…Detroit.

When you declare bankruptcy, you can renegotiate to protect yourself from creditors. But strategically defaulting is the opposite – you keep all your assets except the house and mortgage.

So what to do? Four choices:

1. Man up, economize and make your payments. You’re obligated to the lender, yourself (to preserve your credit), any kids of yours (unless you don’t think you need to set an example) and society. If you steal from your lender, it doesn’t directly affect the rest of us, but it makes civilization incrementally more difficult to live in—the broken window theory.

You don’t like that answer? It’s a house, for crying out loud. You need somewhere to live. No matter how much value it loses, it’s still better than renting and never building a dime of equity. Stop assuming that because your $100,000 house lost 10% of its value last year, it’ll lose a similar amount next year and by 2022 will be worth -$10,000.

2. Short sale. If you know you can’t make your payments, and you’ve exhausted every possible way of earning or otherwise securing money, call the lender and come clean AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. The lender will sell the house at a loss, just to get you out of there and collect some money. You’ll still be on the hook until the bank resells the house, but that won’t last forever and at least you can stop throwing good money after bad.

3. Ask for a loan modification. It’s begging, but your pride already left a while ago.

4. The Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. Tell the lender, “Look, I can’t make the payments. Let’s not short sell, I’ll just give you the damn thing to get out of this suffocating debt.” This hurts your credit rating the least, and tells the lender not to worry about you being one of those evictees who pours concrete in the toilets and makes off with the copper wire.

And next time, get a vanilla 30-year fixed-rate mortgage.

**This post is featured in the Totally Money Blog Carnival-Valentine Edition**